p.41 抽出テキスト

fusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2004; 11: 171-185. PMID: 15052249 40. Cheruvu C, Precious B, Naoum C, et al. Long term prognostic utility of coronary CT angiography in patients with no modifiable coronary artery disease risk factors: Results from the 5 year follow-up of the CONFIRM International Multicenter Registry. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2016; 10: 22-27. PMID: 26719237 41. Danad I, Szymonifka J, Twisk JWR, et al. Diagnostic performance of cardiac imaging methods to diagnose ischaemia-causing coronary artery disease when directly compared with fractional flow reserve as a reference standard: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 2017; 38: 991- 998. PMID: 27141095 42. Sand NPR, Veien KT, Nielsen SS, et al. Prospective Comparison of FFR Derived From Coronary CT Angiography With SPECT Perfusion Imaging in Stable Coronary Artery Disease: The ReASSESS Study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2018; 11: 1640-1650. PMID: 29909103 43. Stocker TJ, Deseive S, Leipsic J, et al. PROTECTION VI investigators. Reduction in radiation exposure in cardiovascular computed tomography imaging: results from the PROspective multicenter registry on radiaTion dose Estimates of cardiac CT angIOgraphy iN daily practice in 2017 (PROTECTION VI). Eur Heart J 2018; 39: 3715-3723. PMID: 30165629 44. Hadamitzky M, Achenbach S, Al-Mallah M, et al. CONFIRM Investigators. Optimized prognostic score for coronary computed tomographic angiography: Results from the CONFIRM registry (COronary CT Angiography EvaluatioN For Clinical Outcomes: An InteRnational Multicenter Registry). J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62: 468-476. PMID: 23727215 44a. Neglia D, Rovai D, Caselli C, et al. EVINCI Study Investigators. Detection of significant coronary artery disease by noninvasive anatomical and functional imaging. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2015; 8: e002179. PMID: 25711274 45. Motoyama S, Sarai M, Narula J, et al. Coronary CT angiography and high-risk plaque morphology. Cardiovasc Interv Ther 2013; 28: 1-8. PMID: 23108779 46. Hulten E, Bittencourt MS, Singh A, et al. Coronary artery disease detected by coronary computed tomographic angiography is associated with intensification of preventive medical therapy and lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2014; 7: 629-638. PMID: 24906356 47. Feuchtner G, Kerber J, Burghard P, et al. The high-risk criteria low-attenuation plaque <60 HU and the napkin-ring sign are the most powerful predictors of MACE: a long-term follow-up study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2017; 18: 772-779. PMID: 27502292 48. Newby DE, Adamson PD, et al. SCOT-HEART Investigators. Coronary CT Angiography and 5-Year Risk of Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 924-933. PMID: 30145934 49. van Rosendael AR, Bax JJ. Improved risk stratification with computed tomographic coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2017; 18: 849-850. PMID: 28329219 50. van Rosendael AR, Shaw LJ, Xie JX, et al. Superior Risk Stratification With Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Using a Comprehensive Atherosclerotic Risk Score. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2019; 12: 1987-1997. PMID: 30660516 51. Bittencourt MS, Hulten EA, Murthy VL, et al. Clinical Outcomes After Evaluation of Stable Chest Pain by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography Versus Usual Care: A Meta-Analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2016; 9: e004419. PMID: 27072303 52. de Jong MC, Genders TS, van Geuns RJ, et al. Diagnostic performance of stress myocardial perfusion imaging for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2012; 22: 1881-1895. PMID: 22527375 53. Nishimura T, Nakajima K, Kusuoka H, et al. Prognostic study of risk stratification among Japanese patients with ischemic heart disease using gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: J-ACCESS study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2008; 35: 319-328. PMID: 17926033 54. Nagel E, Greenwood JP, McCann GP, et al. MR-INFORM Investigators. Magnetic Resonance Perfusion or Fractional Flow Reserve in Coronary Disease. N Engl J Med 2019; 380: 2418-2428. PMID: 31216398 55. Shiraishi S, Sakamoto F, Tsuda N, et al. Prediction of left main or 3-vessel disease using myocardial perfusion reserve on dynamic thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography with a semiconductor gamma camera. Circ J 2015; 79: 623-631. PMID: 25746547 56. Fiechter M, Ghadri JR, Gebhard C, et al. Diagnostic value of

13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion PET: Added value of myocardial flow reserve. J Nucl Med 2012; 53: 1230-1234. PMID: 22776752 57. Murthy VL, Bateman TM, Beanlands RS, et al. Clinical Quantifica-

tion of Myocardial Blood Flow Using PET: Joint Position Paper of the SNMMI Cardiovascular Council and the ASNC. J Nucl Med 2018; 59: 273-293. PMID: 29242396 58. Shaw LJ, Cerqueira MD, Brooks MM, et al. Impact of left ventricular function and the extent of ischemia and scar by stress myocardial perfusion imaging on prognosis and therapeutic risk reduction in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease: Results from the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trial. J Nucl Cardiol 2012; 19: 658-669. PMID: 22527794 59. Inohara T, Kohsaka S, Miyata H, et al. Appropriateness ratings of percutaneous coronary intervention in Japan and its association with the trend of noninvasive testing. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 7: 1000-1009. PMID: 25234672 60. 日本循環器学会.慢性冠動脈疾患診断ガイドライン(2018年改訂版).https://www.j-circ.or.jp/cms/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/ JCS2018_yamagishi_tamaki.pdf 61. Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/ SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Circulation 2011; 124: 2574-2609. PMID: 22064598 62. Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Picard MH, et al. National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-Sponsored ISCH- EMIA Trial Investigators. Comparative definitions for moderate-severe ischemia in stress nuclear, echocardiography, and magnetic resonance imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2014; 7: 593-604. PMID: 24925328 63. Xu Y, Arsanjani R, Clond M, et al. Transient ischemic dilation for coronary artery disease in quantitative analysis of same-day sestamibi myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2012; 19: 465- 473. PMID: 22399366 64. Nasir K, Narula J, Mortensen MB. Message for Upcoming Chest Pain Management Guidelines: Time to Acknowledge the Power of Zero. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 76: 2433-2435. PMID: 33213721 65. Min JK, Koo BK, Erglis A, et al. Effect of image quality on diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive fractional flow reserve: Results from the prospective multicenter international DISCOVER-FLOW study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2012; 6: 191-199. PMID: 22682261 66. Min JK, Leipsic J, Pencina MJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. JAMA 2012; 308: 1237-1245. PMID: 22922562 67. Nørgaard BL, Leipsic J, Gaur S, et al. NXT Trial Study Group. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: The NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps). J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63: 1145-1155. PMID: 24486266 68. Nakazato R, Park HB, Berman DS, et al. Noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography angiography for coronary lesions of intermediate stenosis severity: Results from the DeFACTO study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2013; 6: 881-889. PMID: 24081777 69. Patel MR, Nørgaard BL, Fairbairn TA, et al. 1-Year Impact on Medical Practice and Clinical Outcomes of FFRCT: The ADVANCE Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2020; 13: 97-105. PMID: 31005540 70. Graby J, Metters R, Kandan SR, et al. Real-world clinical and cost analysis of CT coronary angiography and CT coronary angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT)-guided care in the National Health Service. Clin Radiol 2021; 76: 862.e19-862.e28. PMID: 34261595 70a. 日本循環器学会.2021年度循環器疾患診療実態調査報告書. https://www.j-circ.or.jp/jittai_chosa/media/jittai_chosa2020web.pdf 71. Kimura T, Shiomi H, Kuribayashi S, et al. Cost analysis of non-invasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomographic angiography in Japan. Cardiovasc Interv Ther 2015; 30: 38-44. PMID: 25030180 72. Curzen N, Nicholas Z, Stuart B, et al. Fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography coronary angiography in the assessment and management of stable chest pain: the FORECAST randomized trial. Eur Heart J 2021; 42: 3844-3852. PMID: 34269376 73. Tanabe Y, Kido T, Kimura F, et al. Japanese Survey of Radiation Dose Associated With Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography - 2013 Data From a Multicenter Registry in Daily Practice. Circ J 2020; 84: 601-608. PMID: 32074543 74. Otsuka R, Miyazaki Y, Kubo N, et al. The Status of Stress Myocar-