p.64 抽出テキスト
ticals: a Compendium of Current Information Related to Frequently Used Substances. Ann ICRP 2015; 44: 7-321. PMID: 26069086 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/ANIB_44_2S 84. 金谷信一.心臓核医学検査に従事する者の被ばく.日本心臓核医学会誌 2013; 15: 10-11. 85. PET検査施設における放射線安全の確保に関する研究班 編. FDG-PET検査における安全確保に関するガイドライン.2005. 86. 日本アイソトープ協会医学・薬学部会ポジトロン核医学利用専門委員会.PET用放射性医薬品の合成,分注,品質管理に携わる作業者の被ばく線量調査報告.Isotope news 2008; 10: 38-42. 87. Fujibuchi T, Iimori T, Masuda Y, et al. Evaluation of a real-time semiconductor dosimeter and measurement of finger dose in nuclear medicine departments. Radiol Phys Technol 2010; 3: 53-57. PMID: 20821102 88. 赤羽恵一,飯本武志,伊知地猛,他.水晶体の放射線防護に関する専門研究会中間報告書(V)―わが国の各分野における従事者の水晶体被ばく及び防護の現状―.保健物理 2015; 50: 76-89. 89. 日本医学放射線学会他.医療スタッフの放射線安全に係るガイドライン~水晶体の被ばく管理を中心に~.2020. 90. 労働安全衛生規制第596条. 91. Haga Y, Chida K, Kaga Y, et al. Occupational eye dose in interventional cardiology procedures. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 569. PMID: 28373715 92. 塚本篤子.医療におけるスタッフの水晶体被ばくと課題.日白内障会誌 2018; 30: 63-64. 93. 放射線審議会 眼の水晶体の放射線防護検討部会.眼の水晶体に係る放射線防護の在り方について(平成30年2月).https://www. nsr.go.jp/data/000221800.pdf 94. 赤羽恵一,飯本武志,伊知地猛,他.水晶体の放射線防護に関する専門研究会中間報告書(I)―水晶体, 白内障, ICRP が勧告した新たな水晶体等価線量限度の概要―.保健物理 2014; 49: 145-152. 95. 千代田テクノル.平成29年度個人線量の実態.FBNews 2019; No. 501. 96. 藤淵俊王,藤田克也,五十嵐隆元,他.眼の水晶体の等価線量分布(医師,診療科別),日本放射線技術学会学術調査研究班による調査.2018年秋季日本放射線技術学会秋季学術大会. 97. 電離放射線障害防止規則(労働省令第四十一号)第5条.昭和47年9月30日. 98. 厚生労働省労働基準局. 医療従事者の電離放射線に係る皮膚がんの労災認定について(平成24年度~平成29年度(9月7日現在)).平成29 年9 月.https://www.mhlw.go.jp/file/05-Shingikai-10801000-Iseikyoku-Soumuka/0000191785.pdf 99. 足立孝司,能美晶子,安岐敏行,他.内科医の両手指に生じた放射線照射後有棘細胞癌と放射線角化症の多発例.皮膚病診療2004;26:747-750. 100. 田中英一郎,高塚純子,竹之内辰也. 内科医師に生じた手の職業性放射線癌の1例.Skin Cancer 2004: 19: 336-339. 101. 厚生労働省.「電離放射線障害の業務上外に関する検討会」報告 書:甲状腺がんと放射線被ばくに関する医学的知見について(2016年12月).https://www.pref.fukushima.lg.jp/uploaded/attachment/198711.pdf 102. Ivanov VK, Chekin SY, Kashcheev VV, et al. Risk of thyroid cancer among Chernobyl emergency workers of Russia. Radiat Environ Biophys 2008; 47: 463-467. PMID: 18551301 103. Ostroumova E, Gudzenko N, Brenner A, et al. Thyroid cancer incidence in Chornobyl liquidators in Ukraine: SIR analysis, 1986- 2010. Eur J Epidemiol 2014; 29: 337-342. PMID: 24705729 104. 日本放射線技術学会学術委員会 編.血管撮影領域における放射線被曝と防護.放射線医療技術学叢書 1999; 17: 22-25. 105. 粟井一夫,水谷宏,青木雄二,他.最近のX線診断領域における従事者の被曝の問題点と防護衣の在り方検討班報告.日放技学誌 1998; 54: 687-696. 106. 水谷宏,小林幸雄,才田壽一,他.血管撮影における標準的な術者防護用具検討班報告.日放技学誌 2001; 57: 1469-1478. 107. 日本乳癌学会.BQ12.放射線被曝は乳癌発症リスクを増加させるか?乳癌診療ガイドライン.http://jbcs.gr.jp/guidline/2018/index/ekigakuyobo/bq12/ 108. Land CE, Tokunaga M, Koyama K, et al. Incidence of female breast cancer among atomic bomb survivors, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, 1950-1990. Radiat Res 2003; 160: 707-717. PMID: 14640793 109. Moskowitz CS, Chou JF, Wolden SL, et al. Breast cancer after chest radiation therapy for childhood cancer. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32: 2217-2223. PMID: 24752044 110. Hammer GP, Auvinen A, De Stavola BL, et al. Mortality from cancer and other causes in commercial airline crews: a joint analysis of cohorts from 10 countries. Occup Environ Med 2014; 71: 313-322. PMID: 24389960 111. Roguin A, Goldstein J, Bar O, et al. Brain and neck tumors among physicians performing interventional procedures. Am J Cardiol 2013; 111: 1368-1372. PMID: 23419190 112. Kirkwood ML, Arbique GM, Guild JB, et al. Radiation brain dose to vascular surgeons during fluoroscopically guided interventions is not effectively reduced by wearing lead equivalent surgical caps. J Vasc Surg 2018; 68: 567-571. PMID: 29544995 113. ICRP Publication 84: Pregnancy and Medical Radiation. Ann ICRP 2000; 30: 1-43. PMID: 11108925 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/ pdf/10.1177/ANIB_30_1【日本語版】妊娠と医療放射線. 日本アイソトープ協会. 2002. http://www.icrp.org/docs/P84_Japanese.pdf 114. 大野和子.妊娠と放射線検査.Quality Nursing 2002; 8: 607-611. 115. Sharp C, Shrimpton JA, Bury RF. Diagnostic Medical Exposures: Advice on Exposureto Ionising Radiationduring Pregnancy. National Radiological Protection Board, 1998. http://www.hullrad.org.uk/ DocumentMirror/health&safety/HPA/1998_NRPB_diagnostic%20 &%20pregnancy.pdf 116. Shuman WP, Chan KT, Busey JM, et al. Standard and reduced radiation dose liver CT images: adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus model-based iterative reconstruction-comparison of findings and image quality. Radiology 2014; 273: 793-800. PMID: 25170546 117. Imai R, Miyazaki O, Horiuchi T, et al. Ultra-Low-Dose Fetal CT With Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction: A Prospective Pilot Study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017; 208: 1365-1372. PMID: 28463542 118. Kusama T, Ota K. Radiological protection for diagnostic examination of pregnant women. Congenit Anom (Kyoto) 2002; 42: 10-14. PMID: 12094074 119. Best PJ, Skelding KA, Mehran R, et al. Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions’ Women in Innovations (WIN) group. SCAI consensus document on occupational radiation exposure to the pregnant cardiologist and technical personnel. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 77: 232-241. PMID: 21061249 120. 医療用エックス線装置基準(厚生労働省告示第七十五号).平成13 年3 月22 日.https://www.mhlw.go.jp/web/t_doc?dataId=81aa2008&dataType=0&pageNo=1 121. 日本循環器学会.循環器病の診断と治療に関するガイドライン (2010年度合同研究班報告):循環器診療における放射線被ばくに関するガイドライン(2011年改訂版).https://www.j-circ.or.jp/ cms/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/JCS2011_nagai_rad_h.pdf 122. 岸本健治,有賀英司,石垣陸太,他.ディジタル画像の画質と被ばくを考慮した適正線量の研究.日放技学誌 2011; 67: 1381- 1397. PMID: 22104230 123. Thornton RH, Dauer LT, Shuk E, et al. Patient perspectives and preferences for communication of medical imaging risks in a cancer care setting. Radiology 2015; 275: 545-552. PMID: 25803490 124. Guillerman RP. From ‘Image Gently’ to image intelligently: a personalized perspective on diagnostic radiation risk. Pediatr Radiol 2014; 44 Suppl: 444-449. PMID: 25304703 125. WHO. Communicating radiation risks in paediatric imaging: Information to support health care discussions about benefit and risk. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/205033 126. National Research Council. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation, BEIR VII Phase 2. National Academies Press, 2006: 311. 127. 青山隆彦,小山修司,川浦稚代,他.診断X線検査による乳幼児、小児、成人の被ばく線量―X線単純撮影の場合.保健物理 2012; 47: 130-140. 128. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, et al. Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT. Radiology 2004; 233: 649-657. PMID: 15498896 129. Mulkens TH, Bellinck P, Baeyaert M, et al. Use of an automatic exposure control mechanism for dose optimization in multi-detector row CT examinations: clinical evaluation. Radiology 2005; 237: 213-223. PMID: 16126917 130. Bogaard K, van der Zant FM, Knol RJ, et al. High-pitch prospective ECG-triggered helical coronary computed tomography angiography in clinical practice: image quality and radiation dose. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015; 31: 125-133. PMID: 25119888 131. Matsubara K, Sakuda K, Nunome H, et al. 128-slice dual-source CT coronary angiography with prospectively electrocardiography-triggered high-pitch spiral mode: radiation dose, image quality, and diagnostic acceptability. Acta Radiol 2016; 57: 25-32. PMID: 25972368 132. Neefjes LA, Rossi A, Genders TS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 128-slice dual-source CT coronary angiography: a randomized comparison of different acquisition protocols. Eur Radiol 2013; 23: 614- 622. PMID: 23052644 133. Fareed A, Vavere AL, Zimmermann E, et al. Impact of iterative re- construction vs. filtered back projection on image quality in 320-slice CT coronary angiography: Insights from the CORE320