p.201 抽出テキスト
lar Repair (OVER) Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. Long-term Cost-effectiveness in the Veterans Affairs Open vs Endovascular Repair Study of Aortic Abdominal Aneurysm: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg 2016; 151: 1139-1144. PMID: 27627802 845. Herman CR, Charbonneau P, Hongku K, et al. Any nonadherence to instructions for use predicts graft-related adverse events in patients undergoing elective endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2018; 67: 126-133. PMID: 28760581 846. Abbruzzese TA, Kwolek CJ, Brewster DC, et al. Outcomes following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR): an anatomic and device-specific analysis. J Vasc Surg 2008; 48: 19-28. PMID: 18440182 847. Schanzer A, Greenberg RK, Hevelone N, et al. Predictors of abdominal aortic aneurysm sac enlargement after endovascular repair. Circulation 2011; 123: 2848-2855. PMID: 21478500 848. Stanley BM, Semmens JB, Mai Q, et al. Evaluation of patient selection guidelines for endoluminal AAA repair with the Zenith Stent- Graft: the Australasian experience. J Endovasc Ther 2001; 8: 457- 464. PMID: 11718403 849. Zarins CK, Bloch DA, Crabtree T, et al. Stent graft migration after endovascular aneurysm repair: importance of proximal fixation. J Vasc Surg 2003; 38: 1264-1272. PMID: 14681625 850. Sampaio SM, Panneton JM, Mozes GI, et al. Proximal type I endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: predictive factors. Ann Vasc Surg 2004; 18: 621-628. PMID: 15599617 851. Leurs LJ, Hobo R, Buth J. EUROSTAR Collaborators. The multicenter experience with a third-generation endovascular device for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. A report from the EUROSTAR database. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2004; 45: 293-300. PMID: 15365511 852. Hobo R, Kievit J, Leurs LJ, et al. EUROSTAR Collaborators. Influence of severe infrarenal aortic neck angulation on complications at the proximal neck following endovascular AAA repair: a EURO- STAR study. J Endovasc Ther 2007; 14: 1-11. PMID: 17291144 853. Waasdorp EJ, de Vries JP, Hobo R, et al. EUROSTAR Collaborators. Aneurysm diameter and proximal aortic neck diameter influence clinical outcome of endovascular abdominal aortic repair: a 4-year EUROSTAR experience. Ann Vasc Surg 2005; 19: 755-761. PMID: 16205849 854. Lal BK, Zhou W, Li Z, et al. OVER Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. Predictors and outcomes of endoleaks in the Veterans Affairs Open Versus Endovascular Repair (OVER) Trial of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2015; 62: 1394-1404. PMID: 26598115 855. Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Kwong GP, et al. EVAR trial participants. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 364: 843-848. PMID: 15351191 856. Mani K, Björck M, Lundkvist J, et al. Improved long-term survival after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Circulation 2009; 120: 201- 211. PMID: 19581497 857. Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Powell JT, et al. United Kingdom EVAR Trial Investigators. Endovascular repair of aortic aneurysm in patients physically ineligible for open repair. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1872-1880. PMID: 20382982 858. Sweeting MJ, Patel R, Powell JT, et al. EVAR Trial Investigators. Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Patients Physically Ineligible for Open Repair: Very Long-term Follow-up in the EVAR-2 Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg 2017; 266: 713-719. PMID: 28742684 859. Samura M, Morikage N, Otsuka R, et al. Endovascular Aneurysm Repair With Inferior Mesenteric Artery Embolization for Preventing Type II Endoleak: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg 2020; 271: 238-244. PMID: 30946077 860. Rao R, Lane TR, Franklin IJ, et al. Open repair versus fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair of juxtarenal aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2015; 61: 242-255. PMID: 25240242 861. Donas KP, Lee JT, Lachat M, et al. PERICLES investigators. Collected world experience about the performance of the snorkel/chimney endovascular technique in the treatment of complex aortic pathologies: the PERICLES registry. Ann Surg 2015; 262: 546-553. PMID: 26258324 862. Parodi JC, Palmaz JC, Barone HD. Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 1991; 5: 491-499. PMID: 1837729 863. Böckler D, Holden A, Thompson M, et al. Multicenter Nellix Endo- Vascular Aneurysm Sealing system experience in aneurysm sac sealing. J Vasc Surg 2015; 62: 290-298. PMID: 25953017 864. Buth J, van Marrewijk CJ, Harris PL, et al. EUROSTAR Collabora- tors. Outcome of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with conditions considered unfit for an open procedure: a report on the EUROSTAR experience. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35: 211- 221. PMID: 11854717 865. 日本血管外科学会.日本における血管外科手術例数調査2006. http://jsvs.jp/enquete/result/index.html [2019年10月3日閲覧] 866. Kristensen SD, Knuuti J, Saraste A, et al. 2014 ESC/ESA Guidelines on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management: The Joint Task Force on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA). Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 2383-2431. PMID: 25086026 867. Parker MV, O’Donnell SD, Chang AS, et al. What imaging studies are necessary for abdominal aortic endograft sizing? A prospective blinded study using conventional computed tomography, aortography, and three-dimensional computed tomography. J Vasc Surg 2005; 41: 199-205. PMID: 15767998 868. Ruppert V, Leurs LJ, Steckmeier B, et al. Influence of anesthesia type on outcome after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: an analysis based on EUROSTAR data. J Vasc Surg 2006; 44: 16-21. PMID: 16828420 869. Nelson PR, Kracjer Z, Kansal N, et al. A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of totally percutaneous access versus open femoral exposure for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (the PEVAR trial). J Vasc Surg 2014; 59: 1181-1193. PMID: 24440678 870. Bobadilla JL, Hoch JR, Leverson GE, et al. The effect of warfarin therapy on endoleak development after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of the abdominal aorta. J Vasc Surg 2010; 52: 267-271. PMID: 20591602 871. Schlösser FJ, Gusberg RJ, Dardik A, et al. Aneurysm rupture after EVAR: can the ultimate failure be predicted? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009; 37: 15-22. PMID: 19008129 872. Wyss TR, Brown LC, Powell JT, et al. Rate and predictability of graft rupture after endovascular and open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: data from the EVAR Trials. Ann Surg 2010; 252: 805- 812. PMID: 21037436 873. Fransen GA, Vallabhaneni SR, van Marrewijk CJ, et al. EURO- STAR. Rupture of infra-renal aortic aneurysm after endovascular repair: a series from EUROSTAR registry. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2003; 26: 487-493. PMID: 14532875 874. Katsargyris A, Yazar O, Oikonomou K, et al. Fenestrated stentgrafts for salvage of prior endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2013; 46: 49-56. PMID: 23642523 875. Naughton PA, Garcia-Toca M, Rodriguez HE, et al. Endovascular treatment of delayed type 1 and 3 endoleaks. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2011; 34: 751-757. PMID: 21107984 876. Jordan WD Jr, Mehta M, Varnagy D, et al. Aneurysm Treatment using the Heli-FX Aortic Securement System Global Registry (ANCHOR) Workgroup Members. Results of the ANCHOR prospective, multicenter registry of EndoAnchors for type Ia endoleaks and endograft migration in patients with challenging anatomy. J Vasc Surg 2014; 60: 885-892. PMID: 25088739 877. Kim JK, Noll RE Jr, Tonnessen BH, et al. A technique for increased accuracy in the placement of the “giant” Palmaz stent for treatment of type IA endoleak after endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2008; 48: 755-757. PMID: 18727977 878. Donas KP, Telve D, Torsello G, et al. Use of parallel grafts to save failed prior endovascular aortic aneurysm repair and type Ia endoleaks. J Vasc Surg 2015; 62: 578-584. PMID: 26087878 879. Lo RC, Buck DB, Herrmann J, et al. Vascular Study Group of New England. Risk factors and consequences of persistent type II endoleaks. J Vasc Surg 2016; 63: 895-901. PMID: 26796291 880. Marchiori A, von Ristow A, Guimaraes M, et al. Predictive factors for the development of type II endoleaks. J Endovasc Ther 2011; 18: 299-305. PMID: 21679064 881. Couchet G, Pereira B, Carrieres C, et al. Predictive Factors for Type II Endoleaks after Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm by Conventional Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. Ann Vasc Surg 2015; 29: 1673-1679. PMID: 26303269 882. Otsu M, Ishizaka T, Watanabe M, et al. Analysis of anatomical risk factors for persistent type II endoleaks following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair using CT angiography. Surg Today 2016; 46: 48-55. PMID: 25578204 883. Sarac TP, Gibbons C, Vargas L, et al. Long-term follow-up of type II endoleak embolization reveals the need for close surveillance. J Vasc Surg 2012; 55: 33-40. PMID: 22056249 884. Biancari F, Mäkelä J, Juvonen T, et al. Is Inferior Mesenteric Artery Embolization Indicated Prior to Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015; 50: 671-674.