p.185 抽出テキスト

135. Yamada T, Tada S, Harada J. Aortic dissection without intimal rupture: diagnosis with MR imaging and CT. Radiology 1988; 168: 347-352. PMID: 3393653 136. Williams DM, Joshi A, Dake MD, et al. Aortic cobwebs: an anatomic marker identifying the false lumen in aortic dissection--imaging and pathologic correlation. Radiology 1994; 190: 167-174. PMID: 8259399 137. Hamada S, Takamiya M, Kimura K, et al. Type A aortic dissection: evaluation with ultrafast CT. Radiology 1992; 183: 155-158. PMID: 1549663 138. 川俣博志,隅崎達夫.血栓閉鎖型大動脈解離におけるUlcerlike Projection (ULP) の検討―発生頻度,発生部位,および経時的変化を中心として.脈管学 1994; 34: 1017-1032. 139. Wu MT, Wang YC, Huang YL, et al. Intramural blood pools accompanying aortic intramural hematoma: CT appearance and natural course. Radiology 2011; 258: 705-713. PMID: 21212368 140. Williams DM, Lee DY, Hamilton BH, et al. The dissected aorta: part III. Anatomy and radiologic diagnosis of branch-vessel compromise. Radiology 1997; 203: 37-44. PMID: 9122414 141. 大滝誠,栗林幸夫,辻誠,他.大動脈瘤に合併した急性大動脈解離.臨床放射線 1991; 36: 97-102. 142. 斎藤春夫,本間健太郎,祐川博康,他.大動脈瘤に合併した急性大動脈解離.日本画像医学雑誌 1993; 12: 179-185. 143. Goldstein SA, Evangelista A, Abbara S, et al. Multimodality imaging of diseases of the thoracic aorta in adults: from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging: endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015; 28: 119-182. PMID: 25623219 144. 撮像法およびCQ:(4)心血管―心血管領域の標準的撮像法.日本医学放射線学会.画像診断ガイドライン 2016年版.金原出版2016: 210-254. 145. Morris SA, Orbach DB, Geva T, et al. Increased vertebral artery tortuosity index is associated with adverse outcomes in children and young adults with connective tissue disorders. Circulation 2011; 124: 388-396. PMID: 21730308 146. Shellock F. Reference Manual for Magnetic Resonance Safety, Implants, and Devices, 2018 edn. Biomedical Research Publishing Group, 2018. 147. Levine GN, Gomes AS, Arai AE, et al. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiovascular devices: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Circulation 2007; 116: 2878-2891. PMID: 18025533 148. Krinsky GA, Rofsky NM, DeCorato DR, et al. Thoracic aorta: comparison of gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional MR imaging. Radiology 1997; 202: 183-193. PMID: 8988210 149. Ferreira PF, Gatehouse PD, Mohiaddin RH, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance artefacts. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2013; 15: 41. PMID: 23697969 150. Kramer CM, Barkhausen J, Flamm SD, et al. Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Protocols. Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocols 2013 update. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2013; 15: 91. PMID: 24103764 151. Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM, et al. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36: 345-351. PMID: 8875403 152. Guo Q, Zhao J, Huang B, et al. A Systematic Review of Ultrasound or Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared With Computed Tomography for Endoleak Detection and Aneurysm Diameter Measurement After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. J Endovasc Ther 2016; 23: 936-943. PMID: 27542700 153. Urata J, Miyazaki M, Wada H, et al. Clinical evaluation of aortic diseases using nonenhanced MRA with ECG-triggered 3D half-Fourier FSE. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 14: 113-119. PMID: 11477668 154. Krishnam MS, Tomasian A, Deshpande V, et al. Noncontrast 3D steady-state free-precession magnetic resonance angiography of the whole chest using nonselective radiofrequency excitation over a large field of view: comparison with single-phase 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. Invest Radiol 2008; 43: 411-420. PMID: 18496046 155. Fayad ZA, Nahar T, Fallon JT, et al. In vivo magnetic resonance evaluation of atherosclerotic plaques in the human thoracic aorta: a comparison with transesophageal echocardiography. Circulation 2000; 101: 2503-2509. PMID: 10831525 156. Zhu C, Tian B, Leach JR, et al. Non-contrast 3D black blood MRI

for abdominal aortic aneurysm surveillance: comparison with CT angiography. Eur Radiol 2017; 27: 1787-1794. PMID: 27553926 157. Treitl KM, Maurus S, Sommer NN, et al. 3D-black-blood 3T-MRI for the diagnosis of thoracic large vessel vasculitis: A feasibility study. Eur Radiol 2017; 27: 2119-2128. PMID: 27510630 158. Koh DM, Collins DJ. Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188: 1622-1635. PMID: 17515386 159. Utz JA, Herfkens RJ, Heinsimer JA, et al. Valvular regurgitation: dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 1988; 168: 91-94. PMID: 3380987 160. Lotz J, Meier C, Leppert A, et al. Cardiovascular flow measurement with phase-contrast MR imaging: basic facts and implementation. Radiographics 2002; 22: 651-671. PMID: 12006694 161. Dogui A, Redheuil A, Lefort M, et al. Measurement of aortic arch pulse wave velocity in cardiovascular MR: comparison of transit time estimators and description of a new approach. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 33: 1321-1329. PMID: 21591000 162. Dyverfeldt P, Bissell M, Barker AJ, et al. 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2015; 17: 72. PMID: 26257141 163. Clough RE, Waltham M, Giese D, et al. A new imaging method for assessment of aortic dissection using four-dimensional phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging. J Vasc Surg 2012; 55: 914-923. PMID: 22386146 164. Amano Y, Sekine T, Suzuki Y, et al. Time-resolved three-dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping of chronic thoracic aortic dissection: a preliminary investigation. Magn Reson Med Sci 2011; 10: 93-99. PMID: 21720111 165. Tanaka H, Ogino H, Minatoya K, et al. Japanese Study of Spinal Cord Protection in Descending and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Repair investigators. The impact of preoperative identification of the Adamkiewicz artery on descending and thoracoabdominal aortic repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 151: 122-128. PMID: 26344681 166. Yoshioka K, Niinuma H, Ohira A, et al. MR angiography and CT angiography of the artery of Adamkiewicz: noninvasive preoperative assessment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. Radiographics 2003; 23: 1215-1225. PMID: 12975511 167. Yoshioka K, Niinuma H, Ehara S, et al. MR angiography and CT angiography of the artery of Adamkiewicz: state of the art. Radiographics 2006; 26 Suppl: S63-S73. PMID: 17050520 168. Utsunomiya D, Yamashita Y, Okumura S, et al. Demonstration of the Adamkiewicz artery in patients with descending or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm: optimization of contrast-medium application for 64-detector-row CT angiography. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 2684-2690. PMID: 18509656 169. Nishida J, Kitagawa K, Nagata M, et al. Model-based iterative reconstruction for multi-detector row CT assessment of the Adamkiewicz artery. Radiology 2014; 270: 282-291. PMID: 23962418 170. Shimoyama S, Nishii T, Watanabe Y, et al. Advantages of 70-kV CT Angiography for the Visualization of the Adamkiewicz Artery: Comparison with 120-kV Imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017; 38: 2399-2405. PMID: 28912277 171. Yoshioka K, Tanaka R, Takagi H, et al. Ultra-high-resolution CT angiography of the artery of Adamkiewicz: a feasibility study. Neuroradiology 2018; 60: 109-115. PMID: 29080918 172. Yamada N, Takamiya M, Kuribayashi S, et al. MRA of the Adamkiewicz artery: a preoperative study for thoracic aortic aneurysm. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000; 24: 362-368. PMID: 10864069 173. Hyodoh H, Kawaharada N, Akiba H, et al. Usefulness of preoperative detection of artery of Adamkiewicz with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 2005; 236: 1004-1009. PMID: 16020556 174. Yoshioka K, Tanaka R, Takagi H, et al. Systematic evaluation of collateral pathways to the artery of Adamkiewicz using computed tomography. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2018; 54: 19-25. PMID: 29370354 175. Takagi H, Ota H, Natsuaki Y, et al. Identifying the Adamkiewicz artery using 3-T time-resolved magnetic resonance angiography: its role in addition to multidetector computed tomography angiography. Jpn J Radiol 2015; 33: 749-756. PMID: 26497024 176. Bastos MG, Novaes AKB, Pazeli JMP Jr. Traditional and ultrasound physical examinations: a hybrid approach to improve clinical care. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 2018; 64: 474-480. PMID: 30304149 177. Mancuso FJ, Siqueira VN, Moisés VA, et al. Focused cardiac ultra-

sound using a pocket-size device in the emergency room. Arq Bras