p.108 抽出テキスト

文献

1. Osler W. The Lumleian lectures on angina pectoris. Lancet 1910; 175: 973-977. 2. Geleijnse ML, Elhendy A, Kasprzak JD, et al. Safety and prognostic value of early dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography in patients with spontaneous chest pain and a non-diagnostic electrocardiogram. Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 397-406. PMID: 10666354 3. Cohn PF. Asymptomatic coronary artery disease. Pathophysiology, diagnosis, management. Mod Concepts Cardiovasc Dis 1981; 50: 55- 60. PMID: 6974822 4. Medalie JH, Goldbourt U. Unrecognized myocardial infarction: fiveyear incidence, mortality, and risk factors. Ann Intern Med 1976; 84: 526-531. PMID: 132128 5. Lloyd-Jones DM, Wilson PW, Larson MG, et al. Framingham risk score and prediction of lifetime risk for coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol 2004; 94: 20-24. PMID: 15219502 6. NIPPON DATA80 Research Group. Risk assessment chart for death from cardiovascular disease based on a 19-year follow-up study of a Japanese representative population. Circ J 2006; 70: 1249-1255. PMID: 16998254 7. Nishimura K, Okamura T, Watanabe M, et al. Predicting coronary heart disease using risk factor categories for a Japanese urban population, and comparison with the framingham risk score: the suita study. J Atheroscler Thromb 2014; 21: 784-798. PMID: 24671110 8. Kinoshita M, Yokote K, Arai H, et al. Committee for Epidemiology and Clinical Management of Atherosclerosis. Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2017. J Atheroscler Thromb 2018; 25: 846-984. PMID: 30135334 9. 日本動脈硬化学会.動脈硬化性疾患予防ガイドライン2017年版.日本動脈硬化学会 2017. 10. Mabuchi H, Koizumi J, Shimizu M, et al. Development of coronary heart disease in familial hypercholesterolemia. Circulation 1989; 79: 225-232. PMID: 2914343 11. 日本循環器学会.循環器病の診断と治療に関するガイドライン(2009年度合同研究班報告):慢性虚血性心疾患の診断と病態把握のための検査法の選択基準に関するガイドライン(2010年改訂版).http://www.j-circ.or.jp/guideline/pdf/JCS2010_yamagishi_h.pdf 12. Kwok Y, Kim C, Grady D, et al. Meta-analysis of exercise testing to detect coronary artery disease in women. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83: 660-666. PMID: 10080415 13. 日本循環器学会.循環器病の診断と治療に関するガイドライン(2007-2008年度合同研究班報告):冠動脈病変の非侵襲的診断法に関するガイドライン.Circ J 2009; 73 Suppl III. http://www.j-circ. or.jp/guideline/pdf/JCS2010_yamashina_h.pdf 14. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 2324- 2336. PMID: 19038879 15. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 1724-1732. PMID: 19007693 16. Magalhães TA, Kishi S, George RT, et al. Combined coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion by computed tomography in the identification of flow-limiting stenosis - The CORE320 study: An integrated analysis of CT coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2015; 9: 438-445. PMID: 25977111 17. Min JK, Leipsic J, Pencina MJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. JAMA 2012; 308: 1237-1245. PMID: 22922562 18. Cook CM, Petraco R, Shun-Shin MJ, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve : A Systematic Review. JAMA Cardiol 2017; 2: 803-810. PMID: 28538960 19. Douglas PS, Pontone G, Hlatky MA, et al. PLATFORM Investigators. Clinical outcomes of fractional flow reserve by computed tomographic angiography-guided diagnostic strategies vs. usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the prospective longitudinal trial of FFR(CT): outcome and resource impacts study. Eur Heart J 2015; 36: 3359-3367. PMID: 26330417 20. Douglas PS, De Bruyne B, Pontone G, et al. PLATFORM Investiga- tors. 1-Year Outcomes of FFRCT-Guided Care in Patients With Suspected Coronary Disease: The PLATFORM Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 68: 435-445. PMID: 27470449 21. Hlatky MA, Saxena A, Koo BK, et al. Projected costs and consequences of computed tomography-determined fractional flow reserve. Clin Cardiol 2013; 36: 743-748. PMID: 24114863 22. Kimura T, Shiomi H, Kuribayashi S, et al. Cost analysis of non-invasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomographic angiography in Japan. Cardiovasc Interv Ther 2015; 30: 38- 44. PMID: 25030180 23. 日本循環器学会.FFRCT の適正使用指針. 2018. http://www.j-circ. or.jp/topics/FFRCT_tekisei_shishin.pdf 24. Kubo S, Tadamura E, Toyoda H, et al. Effect of caffeine intake on myocardial hyperemic flow induced by adenosine triphosphate and dipyridamole. J Nucl Med 2004; 45: 730-738. PMID: 15136619 25. Elhendy A, Bax JJ, Poldermans D. Dobutamine stress myocardial perfusion imaging in coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med 2002; 43: 1634-1646. PMID: 12468513 26. Travain MI, Wexler JP. Pharmacological stress testing. Semin Nucl Med 1999; 29: 298-318. PMID: 10534233 27. He ZX, Hedrick TD, Pratt CM, et al. Severity of coronary artery calcification by electron beam computed tomography predicts silent myocardial ischemia. Circulation 2000; 101: 244-251. PMID: 10645919 28. Kamiya K, Sakakibara M, Asakawa N, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance performs better in the detection of functionally significant coronary artery stenosis compared to single-photon emission computed tomography and dobutamine stress echocardiography. Circ J 2014; 78: 2468-2476. PMID: 25109426 29. Nakamura M, Yamagishi M, Ueno T, et al. Prevalence of visual-functional mismatch regarding coronary artery stenosis in the CVIT-DE- FER registry. Cardiovasc Interv Ther 2014; 29: 300-308. PMID: 24664513 30. Park SJ, Kang SJ, Ahn JM, et al. Visual-functional mismatch between coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 5: 1029-1036. PMID: 23078732 31. Pijls NH, van Son JA, Kirkeeide RL, et al. Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1993; 87: 1354-1367. PMID: 8462157 32. Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels K, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 1703-1708. PMID: 8637515 33. Bech GJ, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis: a randomized trial. Circulation 2001; 103: 2928-2934. PMID: 11413082 34. Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 2105- 2111. PMID: 17531660 35. Zimmermann FM, Ferrara A, Johnson NP, et al. Deferral vs. performance of percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally non-significant coronary stenosis: 15-year follow-up of the DEFER trial. Eur Heart J 2015; 36: 3182-3188. PMID: 26400825 36. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 213-224. PMID: 19144937 37. Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, et al. FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56: 177-184. PMID: 20537493 38. van Nunen LX, Zimmermann FM, Tonino PA, et al. FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guidance of PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (FAME): 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2015; 386: 1853- 1860. PMID: 26333474 39. Tanaka N, Nakamura M, Akasaka T, et al. CVIT-DEFER Registry Investigators. One-Year Outcome of Fractional Flow Reserve-Based Coronary Intervention in Japanese Daily Practice - CVIT-DEFER