p.120 抽出テキスト

299. Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al. TRITON-TIMI 38 Investigators. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2001–2015. PMID: 17982182 300. Ochiai M, Eto K, Takeshita S, et al. Impact of cilostazol on clinical and angiographic outcome after primary stenting for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1999; 84: 1074–1076. PMID: 10569666 301. Leon MB, Baim DS, Popma JJ, et al. A clinical trial comparing three antithrombotic-drug regimens after coronary-artery stenting. Stent Anticoagulation Restenosis Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 1665–1671. PMID: 9834303 302. Nakamura M, Yamagishi M, Ueno T, et al. Current antiplatelet therapy for Japanese patients with ST elevation acute myocardial infarction: J-AMI registry. Cardiovasc Interv Ther 2013; 28: 162–169. PMID: 23233418 303. Saito S, Isshiki T, Kimura T, et al. Efficacy and safety of adjusted-dose prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in Japanese patients with acute coronary syndrome: the PRASFIT-ACS study. Circ J 2014; 78: 1684–1692. PMID: 24759796 304. Takeyasu N, Watanabe S, Noguchi Y, et al. Randomized comparison of cilostazol vs ticlopidine for antiplatelet therapy after coronary stenting. Circ J 2005; 69: 780–785. PMID: 15988102 305. Nakagawa Y, Nobuyoshi M, Yamaguchi T, et al. Efficacy of abciximab for patients undergoing balloon angioplasty: data from Japanese evaluation of c7E3 Fab for elective and primary PCI organization in randomized trial (JEPPORT). Circ J 2009; 73: 145–151. PMID: 19023152 306. Dewilde WJ, Oirbans T, Verheugt FW, et al. WOEST study investigators. Use of clopidogrel with or without aspirin in patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet 2013; 381: 1107–1115. PMID: 23415013 307. The RISC Group. Risk of myocardial infarction and death during treatment with low dose aspirin and intravenous heparin in men with unstable coronary artery disease. Lancet 1990; 336: 827–830. PMID: 1976875 308. Warkentin TE, Levine MN, Hirsh J, et al. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients treated with low-molecular-weight heparin or unfractionated heparin. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 1330–1335. PMID: 7715641 309. Granger CB, Miller JM, Bovill EG, et al. Rebound increase in thrombin generation and activity after cessation of intravenous heparin in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 1995; 91: 1929–1935. PMID: 7895349 310. Théroux P, Waters D, Lam J, et al. Reactivation of unstable angina after the discontinuation of heparin. N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 141–145. PMID: 1608405 311. Eikelboom JW, Quinlan DJ, Mehta SR, et al. Unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparin as adjuncts to thrombolysis in aspirin-treated patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of the randomized trials. Circulation 2005; 112: 3855–3867. PMID: 16344381 312. Sabatine MS, Morrow DA, Montalescot G, et al. Clopidogrel as Adjunctive Reperfusion Therapy (CLARITY)-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 28 Investigators. Angiographic and clinical outcomes in patients receiving low-molecular-weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin in ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with fibrinolytics in the CLARITY-TIMI 28 Trial. Circulation 2005; 112: 3846–3854. PMID: 16291601 313. Kereiakes DJ, Montalescot G, Antman EM, et al. Low-molecular-weight heparin therapy for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes and during percutaneous coronary intervention: an expert consensus. Am Heart J 2002; 144: 615–624. PMID: 12360156 314. FRagmin Fast Revascularisation during In Stability in Coronary artery disease (FRISC II) Investigators. Long-term low-molecular-mass heparin in unstable coronary-artery disease: FRISC II prospective randomised multicentre study. Lancet 1999; 354: 701–707. PMID: 10475180 315. Silvain J, Beygui F, Barthélémy O, et al. Efficacy and safety of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2012; 344: e553. PMID: 22306479 316. Brieger D, Collet JP, Silvain J, et al. Heparin or enoxaparin anticoagulation for primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 77: 182–190. PMID: 20578166 317. Jang IK, Brown DF, Giugliano RP, et al. A multicenter, randomized

study of argatroban versus heparin as adjunct to tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) in acute myocardial infarction: myocardial infarc- tion with novastan and TPA (MINT) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33: 1879–1885. PMID: 10362188 318. Sorajja P, Gersh BJ, Cox DA, et al. Impact of multivessel disease on

reperfusion success and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 1709–1716. PMID: 17556348 319. 松尾武文.ヘパリン起因性血小板減少症(HIT)の診断と治療について教えて下さい.血栓と循環 2005; 13: 170–173. 320. Politi L, Sgura F, Rossi R, et al. A randomised trial of target-vessel versus multi-vessel revascularisation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: major adverse cardiac events during long-term follow-up. Heart 2010; 96: 662–667. PMID: 19778920 321.Wald DS, Morris JK, Wald NJ, et al. PRAMI Investigators. Randomized trial of preventive angioplasty in myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 1115–1123. PMID: 23991625 322. Jaski BE, Cohen JD, Trausch J, et al. Outcome of urgent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: comparison of single-vessel versus multivessel coronary artery disease. Am Heart J 1992; 124: 1427–1433. PMID: 1462895 323. Smits PC, Abdel-Wahab M, Neumann FJ, et al. Compare-Acute Investigators. Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Multivessel Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med 2017; 376: 1234–1244. PMID: 28317428 324. Engstrøm T, Kelbæk H, Helqvist S, et al. DANAMI-3 PRIMULTI Investigators. Complete revascularisation versus treatment of the culprit lesion only in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease (DANAMI-3 PRIMULTI): an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2015; 386: 665–671. PMID: 26347918 325. Gershlick AH, Khan JN, Kelly DJ, et al. Randomized trial of complete versus lesion-only revascularization in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI and multivessel disease: the CvLPRIT trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 65: 963–972. PMID: 25766941 326. Moreno R, Mehta SR. Nonculprit Vessel Intervention: Let’s COMPLETE the Evidence. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 2017; 70: 418–420. PMID: 28139391 327. Bangalore S, Toklu B, Wetterslev J. Complete versus culprit-only revascularization for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized trials. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 8: e002142. PMID: 25873730 328. Elgendy IY, Mahmoud AN, Kumbhani DJ, et al. Complete or Culprit-Only Revascularization for Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017; 10: 315–324. PMID: 28231899 329. Toyota T, Shiomi H, Taniguchi T, et al. CREDO-Kyoto AMI Registry Investigators. Culprit Vessel-Only vs. Staged Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategies in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Circ J 2016; 80: 371–378. PMID: 26597353 330. Thiele H, Akin I, Sandri M, et al. CULPRIT-SHOCK Investigators. PCI Strategies in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 2419–2432. PMID: 29083953 331. Kornowski R, Mehran R, Dangas G, et al. HORIZONS-AMI Trial Investigators. Prognostic impact of staged versus “one-time” multivessel percutaneous intervention in acute myocardial infarction: analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI (harmonizing outcomes with revascularization and stents in acute myocardial infarction) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58: 704–711. PMID: 21816305 332. Qarawani D, Nahir M, Abboud M, et al. Culprit only versus complete coronary revascularization during primary PCI. Int J Cardiol 2008; 123: 288–292. PMID: 17428557 333. Corpus RA, House JA, Marso SP, et al. Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease and acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2004; 148: 493–500. PMID: 15389238 334. Rigattieri S, Biondi-Zoccai G, Silvestri P, et al. Management of multivessel coronary disease after ST elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty. J Interv Cardiol 2008; 21: 1–7. PMID: 18086133 335. Ibrahim H, Sharma PK, Cohen DJ, et al. Multivessel Versus Culprit

Vessel-Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the TRANS- LATE-ACS Observational Study. J Am Heart Assoc 2017; 6: e006343. PMID: 28982673