p.84 抽出テキスト

protocols, grading of severity, and prediction of valve surgery. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022;9:881141. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.881141 243. Flynn CD, Tian DH, Wilson-Smith A, David T, Matalanis G, Misfeld M, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical outcomes in Marfan patients undergoing aortic root surgery by composite-valve graft or valve sparing root replacement. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2017;6:570–81. https://doi.org/10.21037/acs.2017.11.06 244. Chauvette V, Kluin J, de Kerchove L, El Khoury G, Schäfers HJ, Lansac E, et al. Outcomes of valve-sparing surgery in heritable aortic disorders: results from the AVIATOR registry. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2022;62:ezac366. https://doi.org/10.1093/ ejcts/ezac366 245. Wilson-Smith AR, Wilson-Smith CJ, Strode Smith J, Ng D, Muston BT, Eranki A, et al. The outcomes of three decades of the David and Yacoub procedures in bicuspid aortic valve patients—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2023;12: 286–94. https://doi.org/10.21037/acs-2023-avs2-19 246. Zuo Y, Tan R, Qin C. Outcomes of valve-sparing aortic root replacement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve and tricuspid aortic valve: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Surg 2023;18:206. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-023- 02329-8 247. Mastrobuoni S, Govers PJ, Veen KM, Jahanyar J, van Saane S, Segreto A, et al. Valve-sparing aortic root replacement using the reimplantation (David) technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis on survival and clinical outcome. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2023;12:149–58. https://doi.org/10.21037/acs-2023-avs1-0038 248. Aicher D, Fries R, Rodionycheva S, Schmidt K, Langer F, Schafers HJ. Aortic valve repair leads to a low incidence of valve-related complications. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010;37: 127–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.06.021 249. de Meester C, Pasquet A, Gerber BL, Vancraeynest D, Noirhomme P, El Khoury G, et al. Valve repair improves the outcome of surgery for chronic severe aortic regurgitation: a propensity score analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;148:1913–20. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.02.010 250. Klotz S, Stock S, Sievers HH, Diwoky M, Petersen M, Stierle U, et al. Survival and reoperation pattern after 20 years of experience with aortic valve-sparing root replacement in patients with tricuspid and bicuspid valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018;155: 1403–11.e1401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.12.039 251. Elbatarny M, Tam DY, Edelman JJ, Rocha RV, Chu MWA, Peterson MD, et al. Valve-sparing root replacement versus composite valve grafting in aortic root dilation: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2020;110:296–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. athoracsur.2019.11.054 252. Leontyev S, Schamberger L, Davierwala PM, Von Aspern K, Etz C, Lehmann S, et al. Early and late results after David vs Bentall procedure: a propensity matched analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2019;110:120–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.10.020 253. Mastrobuoni S, de Kerchove L, Navarra E, Watremez C, Vancraeynest D, Rubay J, et al. Long-term experience with valve-sparing reimplantation technique for the treatment of aortic aneurysm and aortic regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019;158:14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.10.155 254. Lansac E, Di Centa I, Sleilaty G, Lejeune S, Khelil N, Berrebi A, et al. Long-term results of external aortic ring annuloplasty for aortic valve repair. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016; 50:350–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezw070 255. Lee H, Cho YH, Sung K, Kim WS, Park KH, Jeong DS, et al. Clinical outcomes of root reimplantation and Bentall procedure: propensity score matching analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2018;106:539–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.02.057 256. Norton EL, Patel PM, Levine D, Wei JW, Binongo JN, Leshnower BG, et al. Bentall versus valve-sparing aortic root replacement for root pathology with moderate-to-severe aortic insufficiency: a propensity-matched analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2023;64: ezad231. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezad231 257. Arabkhani B, Klautz RJM, de Heer F, De Kerchove L, El Khoury G, Lansac E, et al. A multicentre, propensity score matched analysis comparing a valve-sparing approach to valve replacement in aortic root aneurysm: insight from the AVIATOR database. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2023;63:ezac514. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezac514 258. Levine D, Patel P, Zhao Y, Chung M, Singh S, Childress P, et al. Valve-sparing aortic root replacement versus composite valve graft with bioprosthesis in patients under age 50. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023;168:992–1002.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.07. 016 259. Schneider U, Hofmann C, Schöpe J, Niewald AK, Giebels C, Karliova I, et al. Long-term results of differentiated anatomic reconstruction of bicuspid aortic valves. JAMA Cardiol 2020;5:1366–73. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2020.3749 260. Mazine A, Rocha RV, El-Hamamsy I, Ouzounian M, Yanagawa B, Bhatt DL, et al. Ross procedure vs mechanical aortic valve replacement in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Cardiol 2018;3:978–87. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2018. 2946 261. Takkenberg JJM, Klieverik LMA, Schoof PH, van Suylen RJ, van Herwerden LA, Zondervan PE, et al. The Ross procedure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation 2009;119:222–8. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107. 726349 262. Yokoyama Y, Kuno T, Toyoda N, Fujisaki T, Takagi H, Itagaki S, et al. Ross procedure versus mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: a network meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2023;12:e8066. https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.122. 027715 263. El-Hamamsy I, Toyoda N, Itagaki S, Stelzer P, Varghese R, Williams EE, et al. Propensity-matched comparison of the Ross procedure and prosthetic aortic valve replacement in adults. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022;79:805–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc. 2021.11.057 264. Sawaya FJ, Deutsch MA, Seiffert M, Yoon SH, Codner P, Wickramarachchi U, et al. Safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the treatment of pure aortic regurgitation in native valves and failing surgical bioprostheses: results from an international registry study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017;10:1048–56. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.004 265. Yoon SH, Schmidt T, Bleiziffer S, Schofer N, Fiorina C, Munoz-Garcia AJ, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in pure native aortic valve regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:2752–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.006 266. Poletti E, De Backer O, Scotti A, Costa G, Bruno F, Fiorina C, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement for pure native aortic valve regurgitation: the PANTHEON international project. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2023;16:1974–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin. 2023.07.026 267. Garcia S, Ye J, Webb J, Reardon M, Kleiman N, Goel S, et al. Transcatheter treatment of native aortic valve regurgitation: the North American experience with a novel device. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2023;16:1953–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2023.05. 018 268. Adam M, Tamm AR, Wienemann H, Unbehaun A, Klein C, Arnold M, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement for isolated aortic regurgitation using a new self-expanding TAVR system. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2023;16:1965–73. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jcin.2023.07.038 269. Vahl TP, Thourani VH, Makkar RR, Hamid N, Khalique OK, Daniels D, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with high-risk symptomatic native aortic regurgitation (ALIGN-AR): a prospective, multicentre, single-arm study. Lancet 2024;403:1451–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(23)02806-4 270. Borger MA, Preston M, Ivanov J, Fedak PW, Davierwala P, Armstrong S, et al. Should the ascending aorta be replaced more frequently in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;128:677–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs. 2004.07.009 271. Coady MA, Rizzo JA, Hammond GL, Mandapati D, Darr U, Kopf GS, et al. What is the appropriate size criterion for resection of thoracic aortic aneurysms? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;113:476–91; discussion 489–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0022-5223(97)70360-X 272. Davies RR, Goldstein LJ, Coady MA, Tittle SL, Rizzo JA, Kopf GS, et al. Yearly rupture or dissection rates for thoracic aortic aneurysms: simple prediction based on size. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:17–27; discussion 27–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003- 4975(01)03236-2 273. Zafar MA, Li Y, Rizzo JA, Charilaou P, Saeyeldin A, Velasquez CA, et al. Height alone, rather than body surface area, suffices for risk estimation in ascending aortic aneurysm. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018;155:1938–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.10.140 274. Popović ZB, Desai MY, Griffin BP. Decision making with imaging in asymptomatic aortic regurgitation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;11:1499–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jcmg.2018.05.027 275. Evangelista A, Sitges M, Jondeau G, Nijveldt R, Pepi M, Cuellar H, et al. Multimodality imaging in thoracic aortic diseases: a clinical consensus statement from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the European Society of Cardiology working group on aorta and peripheral vascular diseases. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2023;24:e65–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jead024 276. Weisenberg D, Omelchenko A, Shapira Y, Vaturi M, Monakier D, Bental T, et al. Mid-term echocardiographic progression of patients with moderate aortic regurgitation: implications for aortic valve surgery. J Heart Valve Dis 2013;22:192–4. 277. Budts W, Pieles GE, Roos-Hesselink JW, Sanz de la Garza M, D’Ascenzi F, Giannakoulas G, et al. Recommendations for participation in competitive sport in adolescent and adult athletes with Congenital Heart Disease (CHD): position statement of the Sports Cardiology & Exercise Section of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC), the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Working Group on Adult Congenital Heart Disease and the Sports Cardiology, Physical Activity and Prevention Working Group of the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). Eur Heart J 2020;41:4191–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ eurheartj/ehaa501 278. Robertson EN, van der Linde D, Sherrah AG, Vallely MP, Wilson M, Bannon PG, et al. Familial non-syndromal thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections—incidence and family screening outcomes. Int J Cardiol 2016;220:43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijcard.2016.06.086 279. Bray JJH, Freer R, Pitcher A, Kharbanda R. Family screening for bicuspid aortic valve and aortic dilatation: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 2023;44:3152–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/ eurheartj/ehad320 280. Roberts WC, Ko JM. Frequency by decades of unicuspid, bicuspid, and tricuspid aortic valves in adults having isolated aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis, with or without associated aortic regurgitation. Circulation 2005;111:920–5. https://doi.org/ 10.1161/01.Cir.0000155623.48408.C5 Downloaded from academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/46/44/4635/8234488 by guest on 07 October 2026