GL検索 v0.1.0
画像は 129 ページを描画したものです
page 129

p.129 抽出テキスト

124. Rodway AD, Cheal D, Allan C, Pazos-Casal F, Hanna L, Field BCT, et al. Ankle Doppler for cuffless ankle brachial index estimation and peripheral artery disease diagnosis independent of diabetes. J Clin Med 2022;12:97. https://doi.org/10.3390/ jcm12010097 125. Katsanos K, Tepe G, Tsetis D, Fanelli F. Standards of practice for superficial femoral and popliteal artery angioplasty and stenting. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2014;37: 592–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-014-0876-3 126. Coffi SB, Ubbink DT, Zwiers I, van Gurp JA, Legemate DA. Improved assessment of the hemodynamic significance of borderline iliac stenoses with use of hyperemic duplex scanning. J Vasc Surg 2002;36:575–80. https://doi.org/10.1067/mva.2002.126086 127. Elsman BH, Legemate DA, de Vos HJ, Mali WP, Eikelboom BC. Hyperaemic colour duplex scanning for the detection of aortoiliac stenoses. a comparative study with intra-arterial pressure measurement. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1997;14:462–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1078-5884(97)80125-6 128. Venermo M, Sprynger M, Desormais I, Björck M, Brodmann M, Cohnert T, et al. Follow-up of patients after revascularisation for peripheral arterial diseases: a consensus document from the European Society of Cardiology working group on aorta and peripheral vascular diseases and the European Society for Vascular Surgery. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2019;26:1971–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487319846999 129. Golemati S, Cokkinos DD. Recent advances in vascular ultrasound imaging technology and their clinical implications. Ultrasonics 2022;119:106599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ultras.2021.106599 130. Itoga NK, Minami HR, Chelvakumar M, Pearson K, Mell MM, Bendavid E, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of asymptomatic peripheral artery disease screening with the ABI test. Vasc Med 2018;23:97–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X17745371 131. Xu D, Zou L, Xing Y, Hou L, Wei Y, Zhang J, et al. Diagnostic value of ankle-brachial index in peripheral arterial disease: a meta-analysis. Can J Cardiol 2013;29:492–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2012.06.014 132. Hashimoto T, Ichihashi S, Iwakoshi S, Kichikawa K. Combination of pulse volume recording (PVR) parameters and ankle-brachial index (ABI) improves diagnostic accuracy for peripheral arterial disease compared with ABI alone. Hypertens Res 2016;39:430–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/hr.2016.13 133. Tehan PE, Bray A, Chuter VH. Non-invasive vascular assessment in the foot with diabetes: sensitivity and specificity of the ankle brachial index, toe brachial index and continuous wave Doppler for detecting peripheral arterial disease. J Diabetes Complications 2016;30:155–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2015.07.019 134. Loukas M, Bilinsky E, Bilinsky S, Blaak C, Tubbs RS, Anderson RH. The anatomy of the aortic root. Clin Anat 2014;27:748–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22295 135. Dagenais F. Anatomy of the thoracic aorta and of its branches. Thorac Surg Clin 2011; 21:219–27, viii. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thorsurg.2010.12.004 136. Lombardi JV, Hughes GC, Appoo JJ, Bavaria JE, Beck AW, Cambria RP, et al. Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) reporting standards for type B aortic dissections. Ann Thorac Surg 2020;109:959–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. athoracsur.2019.10.005 137. Rodríguez-Palomares JF, Teixidó-Tura G, Galuppo V, Cuéllar H, Laynez A, Gutiérrez L, et al. Multimodality assessment of ascending aortic diameters: comparison of different measurement methods. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2016;29:819–26.e4. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.echo.2016.04.006 138. Saura D, Dulgheru R, Caballero L, Bernard A, Kou S, Gonjilashvili N, et al. Two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic normal reference ranges for proximal aorta dimensions: results from the EACVI NORRE study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;18:167–79. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jew053 139. Bons LR, Duijnhouwer AL, Boccalini S, van den Hoven AT, van der Vlugt MJ, Chelu RG, et al. Intermodality variation of aortic dimensions: how, where and when to measure the ascending aorta. Int J Cardiol 2019;276:230–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018. 08.067 140. Amsallem M, Ou P, Milleron O, Henry-Feugeas M-C, Detaint D, Arnoult F, et al. Comparative assessment of ascending aortic aneurysms in Marfan patients using ECG-gated computerized tomographic angiography versus trans-thoracic echocardiography. Int J Cardiol 2015;184:22–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.01.086 141. Matthews EO, Pinchbeck J, Elmore K, Jones RE, Moxon JV, Golledge J. The reproducibility of measuring maximum abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter from ultrasound images. Ultrasound J 2021;13:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-021-00211-z 142. Bonnafy T, Lacroix P, Desormais I, Labrunie A, Marin B, Leclerc A, et al. Reliability of the measurement of the abdominal aortic diameter by novice operators using a pocket-sized ultrasound system. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2013;106:644–50. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.acvd.2013.08.004 143. Fitzgerald BT, Kwon A, Scalia GM. The new dimension in aortic measurements—use of the inner edge measurement for the thoracic aorta in Australian patients. Heart Lung Circ 2015;24:1104–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2015.05.001 144. Burman ED, Keegan J, Kilner PJ. Aortic root measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: specification of planes and lines of measurement and corresponding normal values. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;1:104–13. https://doi.org/10.1161/ circimaging.108.768911 145. Muraru D, Maffessanti F, Kocabay G, Peluso D, Bianco LD, Piasentini E, et al. Ascending aorta diameters measured by echocardiography using both leading edge-to-leading edge and inner edge-to-inner edge conventions in healthy volunteers. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;15:415–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jet173 146. Vis JC, Rodríguez-Palomares JF, Teixidó-Tura G, Galian-Gay L, Granato C, Guala A, et al. Implications of asymmetry and valvular morphotype on echocardiographic measurements of the aortic root in bicuspid aortic valve. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2019;32: 105–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2018.08.004 147. Ghulam Ali S, Fusini L, Dalla Cia A, Tamborini G, Gripari P, Muratori M, et al. Technological advancements in echocardiographic assessment of thoracic aortic dilatation: head to head comparison among multidetector computed tomography, 2-dimensional, and 3-dimensional echocardiography measurements. J Thorac Imaging 2018;33:232–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/rti.0000000000000330 148. Mendoza DD, Kochar M, Devereux RB, Basson CT, Min JK, Holmes K, et al. Impact of image analysis methodology on diagnostic and surgical classification of patients with thoracic aortic aneurysms. Ann Thorac Surg 2011;92:904–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.athoracsur.2011.03.130 149. Campens L, Demulier L, De Groote K, Vandekerckhove K, De Wolf D, Roman MJ, et al. Reference values for echocardiographic assessment of the diameter of the aortic root and ascending aorta spanning all age categories. Am J Cardiol 2014;114:914–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.06.024 150. Pedersen OM, Aslaksen A, Vik-Mo H. Ultrasound measurement of the luminal diameter of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries in patients without vascular disease. J Vasc Surg 1993;17:596–601. https://doi.org/10.1067/mva.1993.39525 151. Kim H, Kwon TW, Choi E, Jeong S, Kim H-K, Han Y, et al. Aortoiliac diameter and length in a healthy cohort. PLoS One 2022;17:e0268077. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0268077 152. Evangelista A, Flachskampf FA, Erbel R, Antonini-Canterin F, Vlachopoulos C, Rocchi G, et al. Echocardiography in aortic diseases: EAE recommendations for clinical practice. Eur J Echocardiogr 2010;11:645–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejechocard/jeq056 153. Zafar MA, Li Y, Rizzo JA, Charilaou P, Saeyeldin A, Velasquez CA, et al. Height alone, rather than body surface area, suffices for risk estimation in ascending aortic aneurysm. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018;155:1938–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.10.140 154. Masri A, Kalahasti V, Svensson LG, Roselli EE, Johnston D, Hammer D, et al. Aortic cross-sectional area/height ratio and outcomes in patients with a trileaflet aortic valve and a dilated aorta. Circulation 2016;134:1724–37. https://doi.org/10.1161/ circulationaha.116.022995 155. Wu J, Zafar MA, Li Y, Saeyeldin A, Huang Y, Zhao R, et al. Ascending aortic length and risk of aortic adverse events: the neglected dimension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;74: 1883–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.078 156. Pham MHC, Ballegaard C, de Knegt MC, Sigvardsen PE, Sørgaard MH, Fuchs A, et al. Normal values of aortic dimensions assessed by multidetector computed tomography in the Copenhagen general population study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;20: 939–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jez012 157. Davis AE, Lewandowski AJ, Holloway CJ, Ntusi NAB, Banerjee R, Nethononda R, et al. Observational study of regional aortic size referenced to body size: production of a cardiovascular magnetic resonance nomogram. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2014;16:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429x-16-9 158. Braley KT, Tang X, Makil ES, Borroughs-Ray D, Collins RT. The impact of body weight on the diagnosis of aortic dilation—misdiagnosis in overweight and underweight groups. Echocardiography 2017;34:1029–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.13565 159. Evangelista A, Sitges M, Jondeau G, Nijveldt R, Pepi M, Cuellar H, et al. Multimodality imaging in thoracic aortic diseases: a clinical consensus statement from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the European Society of Cardiology working group on aorta and peripheral vascular diseases. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2023;24:e65–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jead024 160. Macdonald DB, Hurrell C, Costa AF, McInnes MDF, O’Malley ME, Barrett B, et al. Canadian Association of Radiologists Guidance on contrast associated acute kidney injury. Can Assoc Radiol J 2022;73:499–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 08465371221083970 161. Committee opinion no. 723: guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol 2017;130:e210–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.000000000 0002355 162. von Kodolitsch Y, Nienaber CA, Dieckmann C, Schwartz AG, Hofmann T, Brekenfeld C, et al. Chest radiography for the diagnosis of acute aortic syndrome. Am J Med 2004; 116:73–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.08.030 163. Nazerian P, Pivetta E, Veglia S, Cavigli E, Mueller C, de Matos Soeiro A, et al. Integrated use of conventional chest radiography cannot rule out acute aortic syndromes in emergency department patients at low clinical probability. Acad Emerg Med 2019; 26:1255–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13819 164. Hartnell GG, Wakeley CJ, Tottle A, Papouchado M, Wilde RP. Limitations of chest radiography in discriminating between aortic dissection and myocardial infarction: implications for thrombolysis. J Thorac Imaging 1993;8:152–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/ 00005382-199321000-00008 165. Evangelista A, Avegliano G, Aguilar R, Cuellar H, Igual A, Gonzalez-Alujas T, et al. Impact of contrast-enhanced echocardiography on the diagnostic algorithm of acute aortic dissection. Eur Heart J 2010;31:472–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehp505 Downloaded from academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/45/36/3538/7738955 by guest on 07 October 2026