p.99 抽出テキスト

stress in the presence or absence of angiographic coronary disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;11:e007483. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.007483 235. Taqui S, Ferencik M, Davidson BP, Belcik JT, Moccetti F, Layoun M, et al. Coronary microvascular dysfunction by myocardial contrast echocardiography in nonelderly patients referred for computed tomographic coronary angiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2019;32:817–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2019.03.001 236. Porter TR, Mulvagh SL, Abdelmoneim SS, Becher H, Belcik JT, Bierig M, et al. Clinical applications of ultrasonic enhancing agents in echocardiography: 2018 American Society of Echocardiography Guidelines update. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2018;31: 241–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2017.11.013 237. Hu C, Feng Y, Huang P, Jin J. Adverse reactions after the use of SonoVue contrast agent: characteristics and nursing care experience. Medicine 2019;98:e17745. https:// doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000017745 238. Ciampi Q, Zagatina A, Cortigiani L, Gaibazzi N, Borguezan Daros C, Zhuravskaya N, et al. Functional, anatomical, and prognostic correlates of coronary flow velocity reserve during stress echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;74:2278–91. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.1046 239. Ahmadvazir S, Shah BN, Zacharias K, Senior R. Incremental prognostic value of stress echocardiography with carotid ultrasound for suspected CAD. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;11:173–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.12.020 240. Ahmadvazir S, Pradhan J, Khattar RS, Senior R. Long-term prognostic value of simultaneous assessment of atherosclerosis and ischemia in patients with suspected angina: implications for routine use of carotid ultrasound during stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2020;33:559–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2019.11.019 241. Fleischmann KE, Hunink MG, Kuntz KM, Douglas PS. Exercise echocardiography or exercise SPECT imaging? A meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance. JAMA 1998; 280:913–20. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.10.913 242. Marwick TH, Case C, Vasey C, Allen S, Short L, Thomas JD. Prediction of mortality by exercise echocardiography: a strategy for combination with the Duke treadmill score. Circulation 2001;103:2566–71. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.103.21.2566 243. Shaw LJ, Vasey C, Sawada S, Rimmerman C, Marwick TH. Impact of gender on risk stratification by exercise and dobutamine stress echocardiography: long-term mortality in 4234 women and 6898 men. Eur Heart J 2005;26:447–56. https://doi.org/10. 1093/eurheartj/ehi102 244. Gurunathan S, Zacharias K, Akhtar M, Ahmed A, Mehta V, Karogiannis N, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a management strategy based on exercise echocardiography versus exercise electrocardiography in patients presenting with suspected angina during long term follow up: a randomized study. Int J Cardiol 2018;259:1–7. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.01.112 245. Vamvakidou A, Danylenko O, Pradhan J, Kelshiker M, Jones T, Whiteside D, et al. Relative clinical value of coronary computed tomography and stress echocardiography-guided management of stable chest pain patients: a propensitymatched analysis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2020;22:1473–81. https://doi.org/10. 1093/ehjci/jeaa303 246. Woodward W, Dockerill C, McCourt A, Upton R, O’Driscoll J, Balkhausen K, et al. Real-world performance and accuracy of stress echocardiography: the EVAREST observational multi-centre study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2022;23:689–98. https:// doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeab092 247. Senior R, Andersson O, Caidahl K, Carlens P, Herregods MC, Jenni R, et al. Enhanced left ventricular endocardial border delineation with an intravenous injection of SonoVue, a new echocardiographic contrast agent: a European multicenter study. Echocardiography 2000;17:705–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8175.2000. tb01223.x 248. Edvardsen T, Asch FM, Davidson B, Delgado V, DeMaria A, Dilsizian V, et al. Non-invasive imaging in coronary syndromes: recommendations of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography, in collaboration with the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2022;23:e6–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeab244 249. Tsutsui JM, Elhendy A, Anderson JR, Xie F, McGrain AC, Porter TR. Prognostic value of dobutamine stress myocardial contrast perfusion echocardiography. Circulation 2005; 112:1444–50. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.105.537134 250. Jeetley P, Hickman M, Kamp O, Lang RM, Thomas JD, Vannan MA, et al. Myocardial contrast echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery stenosis: a prospective multicenter study in comparison with single-photon emission computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:141–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.054 251. Dolan MS, Gala SS, Dodla S, Abdelmoneim SS, Xie F, Cloutier D, et al. Safety and efficacy of commercially available ultrasound contrast agents for rest and stress echocardiography a multicenter experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:32–8. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jacc.2008.08.066 252. Gaibazzi N, Reverberi C, Lorenzoni V, Molinaro S, Porter TR. Prognostic value of highdose dipyridamole stress myocardial contrast perfusion echocardiography. Circulation 2012;126:1217–24. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.112.110031 253. Gaibazzi N, Rigo F, Lorenzoni V, Molinaro S, Bartolomucci F, Reverberi C, et al. Comparative prediction of cardiac events by wall motion, wall motion plus coronary flow reserve, or myocardial perfusion analysis: a multicenter study of contrast stress echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;6:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jcmg.2012.08.009 254. Senior R, Moreo A, Gaibazzi N, Agati L, Tiemann K, Shivalkar B, et al. Comparison of sulfur hexafluoride microbubble (SonoVue)-enhanced myocardial contrast echocardiography with gated single-photon emission computed tomography for detection of significant coronary artery disease: a large European multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:1353–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.082 255. Schroder J, Prescott E. Doppler echocardiography assessment of coronary microvascular function in patients with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease. Front Cardiovasc Med 2021;8:723542. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.723542 256. Yang Z, Zheng H, Zhou T, Yang L-F, Hu X-F, Peng Z-H, et al. Diagnostic performance of myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT, CT and MR compared to fractional flow reserve as reference standard. Int J Cardiol 2015;190:103–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijcard.2015.04.091 257. Takx RA, Blomberg BA, El Aidi H, Habets J, de Jong PA, Nagel E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;8: e002666. https://doi.org/10.1161/circimaging.114.002666 258. Dai N, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Hou L, Li W, Fan B, et al. Enhanced diagnostic utility achieved by myocardial blood analysis: a meta-analysis of noninvasive cardiac imaging in the detection of functional coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol 2016;221:665–73. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.07.031 259. Mowatt G, Brazzelli M, Gemmell H, Hillis GS, Metcalfe M, Vale L, et al. Systematic review of the prognostic effectiveness of SPECT myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease and following myocardial infarction. Nucl Med Commun 2005;26:217–29. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006231- 200503000-00006 260. Cantoni V, Green R, Acampa W, Zampella E, Assante R, Nappi C, et al. Diagnostic performance of myocardial perfusion imaging with conventional and CZT single-photon emission computed tomography in detecting coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. J Nucl Cardiol 2021;28:698–715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01747-3 261. Panjer M, Dobrolinska M, Wagenaar NRL, Slart R. Diagnostic accuracy of dynamic CZT-SPECT in coronary artery disease. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nucl Cardiol 2022;29:1686–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-021-02721-8 262. Juárez-Orozco LE, Tio RA, Alexanderson E, Dweck M, Vliegenthart R, El Moumni M, et al. Quantitative myocardial perfusion evaluation with positron emission tomography and the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review of prognostic studies. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;19:1179–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jex331 263. Green R, Cantoni V, Acampa W, Assante R, Zampella E, Nappi C, et al. Prognostic value of coronary flow reserve in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease referred to PET myocardial perfusion imaging: a meta-analysis. J Nucl Cardiol 2021; 28:904–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-02000-7 264. Groepenhoff F, Klaassen RGM, Valstar GB, Bots SH, Onland-Moret NC, Den Ruijter HM, et al. Evaluation of non-invasive imaging parameters in coronary microvascular disease: a systematic review. BMC Med Imaging 2021;21:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s12880-020-00535-7 265. Yang K, Yu SQ, Lu MJ, Zhao SH. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging for detecting hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease between cardiac magnetic resonance and nuclear medical imaging: a meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 2019;293:278–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.06. 054 266. Mc Ardle BA, Dowsley TF, deKemp RA, Wells GA, Beanlands RS. Does rubidium-82 PET have superior accuracy to SPECT perfusion imaging for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary disease?: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60: 1828–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.038 267. Parker MW, Iskandar A, Limone B, Perugini A, Kim H, Jones C, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of cardiac positron emission tomography versus single photon emission computed tomography for coronary artery disease: a bivariate meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:700–7. https://doi.org/10.1161/circimaging.112.978270 268. Danad I, Raijmakers PG, Driessen RS, Leipsic J, Raju R, Naoum C, et al. Comparison of coronary CT angiography, SPECT, PET, and hybrid imaging for diagnosis of ischemic heart disease determined by fractional flow reserve. JAMA Cardiol 2017;2:1100–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2471 269. Rasmussen LD, Winther S, Eftekhari A, Karim SR, Westra J, Isaksen C, et al. Second-line myocardial perfusion imaging to detect obstructive stenosis: head-to-head comparison of CMR and PET. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2023;16:642–55. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.11.015 270. Patel KK, Al Badarin F, Chan PS, Spertus JA, Courter S, Kennedy KF, et al. Randomized comparison of clinical effectiveness of pharmacologic SPECT and PET MPI in symptomatic CAD patients. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;12:1821–31. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jcmg.2019.04.020 271. Patel KK, Spertus JA, Chan PS, Sperry BW, Al Badarin F, Kennedy KF, et al. Myocardial blood flow reserve assessed by positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion

ESC Guidelines                                                                                                                                                                                          3513

Downloaded from academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/45/36/3415/7743115 by guest on 07 October 2026