p.98 抽出テキスト

196. Schuijf JD, Wijns W, Jukema JW, Atsma DE, de Roos A, Lamb HJ, et al. Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:2508–14. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.05.080 197. Siontis GC, Mavridis D, Greenwood JP, Coles B, Nikolakopoulou A, Jüni P, et al. Outcomes of non-invasive diagnostic modalities for the detection of coronary artery disease: network meta-analysis of diagnostic randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2018; 360:k504. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k504 198. Neglia D, Liga R, Gimelli A, Podlesnikar T, Cvijić M, Pontone G, et al. Use of cardiac imaging in chronic coronary syndromes: the EURECA Imaging registry. Eur Heart J 2023;44:142–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehac640 199. Celeng C, Leiner T, Maurovich-Horvat P, Merkely B, de Jong P, Dankbaar JW, et al. Anatomical and functional computed tomography for diagnosing hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;12: 1316–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.07.022 200. Curzen N, Nicholas Z, Stuart B, Wilding S, Hill K, Shambrook J, et al. Fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography coronary angiography in the assessment and management of stable chest pain: the FORECAST randomized trial. Eur Heart J 2021;42:3844–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab444 201. Mickley H, Veien KT, Gerke O, Lambrechtsen J, Rohold A, Steffensen FH, et al. Diagnostic and clinical value of FFR(CT) in stable chest pain patients with extensive coronary calcification: the FACC study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2022;15:1046–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.12.010 202. Nørgaard BL, Terkelsen CJ, Mathiassen ON, Grove EL, Bøtker HE, Parner E, et al. Coronary CT angiographic and flow reserve-guided management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;72:2123–34. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jacc.2018.07.043 203. Pontone G, Weir-McCall JR, Baggiano A, Del Torto A, Fusini L, Guglielmo M, et al. Determinants of rejection rate for coronary CT angiography fractional flow reserve analysis. Radiology 2019;292:597–605. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019182673 204. Andreini D, Belmonte M, Penicka M, Van Hoe L, Mileva N, Paolisso P, et al. Impact of coronary CT image quality on the accuracy of the FFR(CT) planner. Eur Radiol 2023; 34:2677–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-10228-8 205. Rochitte CE, George RT, Chen MY, Arbab-Zadeh A, Dewey M, Miller JM, et al. Computed tomography angiography and perfusion to assess coronary artery stenosis causing perfusion defects by single photon emission computed tomography: the CORE320 study. Eur Heart J 2014;35:1120–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ eht488 206. Nous FMA, Geisler T, Kruk MBP, Alkadhi H, Kitagawa K, Vliegenthart R, et al. Dynamic myocardial perfusion CT for the detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2022;15:75–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg. 2021.07.021 207. Rossi A, Merkus D, Klotz E, Mollet N, de Feyter PJ, Krestin GP. Stress myocardial perfusion: imaging with multidetector CT. Radiology 2014;270:25–46. https://doi.org/10. 1148/radiol.13112739 208. Hoffmann U, Ferencik M, Udelson JE, Picard MH, Truong QA, Patel MR, et al. Prognostic value of noninvasive cardiovascular testing in patients with stable chest pain: insights from the PROMISE trial (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain). Circulation 2017;135:2320–32. https://doi.org/10.1161/ CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024360 209. Adamson PD, Williams MC, Dweck MR, Mills NL, Boon NA, Daghem M, et al. Guiding therapy by coronary CT angiography improves outcomes in patients with stable chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;74:2058–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.085 210. Williams MC, Moss AJ, Dweck M, Adamson PD, Alam S, Hunter A, et al. Coronary artery plaque characteristics associated with adverse outcomes in the SCOT-HEART study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;73:291–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jacc.2018.10.066 211. Foy AJ, Dhruva SS, Peterson B, Mandrola JM, Morgan DJ, Redberg RF. Coronary computed tomography angiography vs functional stress testing for patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med 2017; 177:1623–31. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.4772 212. SCOT-HEART Investigators. CT coronary angiography in patients with suspected angina due to coronary heart disease (SCOT-HEART): an open-label, parallel-group, multicentre trial. Lancet 2015;385:2383–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15) 60291-4 213. Cury RC, Leipsic J, Abbara S, Achenbach S, Berman D, Bittencourt M, et al. CAD-RADS 2.0—2022 Coronary Artery Disease—Reporting and Data System an expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the North America Society of Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2022;16:536–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct. 2022.07.002 214. Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD, Cramer MJ, Mollet NR, van Mieghem CAG, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:2135–44. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.058 215. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, Arbab-Zadeh A, Niinuma H, Gottlieb I, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 2008;359:2324–36. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0806576 216. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, Gitter M, Sutherland J, Halamert E, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1724–32. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jacc.2008.07.031 217. Min JK, Koduru S, Dunning AM, Cole JH, Hines JL, Greenwell D, et al. Coronary CT angiography versus myocardial perfusion imaging for near-term quality of life, cost and radiation exposure: a prospective multicenter randomized pilot trial. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2012;6:274–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2012.06.002 218. Douglas PS, Pontone G, Hlatky MA, Patel MR, Norgaard BL, Byrne RA, et al. Clinical outcomes of fractional flow reserve by computed tomographic angiography-guided diagnostic strategies vs. usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the prospective longitudinal trial of FFRCT: outcome and resource impacts study. Eur Heart J 2015;36:3359–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv444 219. Dewey M, Rief M, Martus P, Kendziora B, Feger S, Dreger H, et al. Evaluation of computed tomography in patients with atypical angina or chest pain clinically referred for invasive coronary angiography: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2016;355:i5441. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5441 220. Chang HJ, Lin FY, Gebow D, An HY, Andreini D, Bathina R, et al. Selective referral using CCTA versus direct referral for individuals referred to invasive coronary angiography for suspected CAD: a randomized, controlled, open-label trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;12:1303–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.09.018 221. Sharma A, Coles A, Sekaran NK, Pagidipati NJ, Lu MT, Mark DB, et al. Stress testing versus CT angiography in patients with diabetes and suspected coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;73:893–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.056 222. The Discharge Trial Group; Maurovich-Horvat P, Bosserdt M, Kofoed KF, Rieckmann N, Benedek T, et al. CT or invasive coronary angiography in stable chest pain. N Engl J Med 2022;386:1591–602. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2200963 223. Smulders MW, Jaarsma C, Nelemans PJ, Bekkers SCAM, Bucerius J, Leiner T, et al. Comparison of the prognostic value of negative non-invasive cardiac investigations in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease-a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;18:980–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jex014 224. Picano E, Mathias W Jr, Pingitore A, Bigi R, Previtali M. Safety and tolerability of dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography: a prospective, multicentre study. Echo Dobutamine International Cooperative Study Group. Lancet 1994;344: 1190–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90508-8 225. Varga A, Garcia MA, Picano E. Safety of stress echocardiography (from the International Stress Echo Complication Registry). Am J Cardiol 2006;98:541–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.02.064 226. Lorenzoni V, Bellelli S, Caselli C, Knuuti J, Underwood SR, Neglia D, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of stand-alone or combined non-invasive imaging tests for the diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease: results from the EVINCI study. Eur J Health Econ 2019;20:1437–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-019-01096-5 227. Pellikka PA, Arruda-Olson A, Chaudhry FA, Chen MH, Marshall JE, Porter TR, et al. Guidelines for performance, interpretation, and application of stress echocardiography in ischemic heart disease: from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2020;33:1–41.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2019.07.001 228. Marwick TH. Stress echocardiography. Heart 2003;89:113–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/ heart.89.1.113 229. Plana JC, Mikati IA, Dokainish H, Lakkis N, Abukhalil J, Davis R, et al. A randomized cross-over study for evaluation of the effect of image optimization with contrast on the diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine echocardiography in coronary artery disease The OPTIMIZE Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;1:145–52. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jcmg.2007.10.014 230. Qian L, Xie F, Xu D, Porter TR. Long-term prognostic value of stress myocardial perfusion echocardiography in patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2021;22:553–62. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeaa026 231. Abdelmoneim SS, Dhoble A, Bernier M, Erwin PJ, Korosoglou G, Senior R, et al. Quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography during pharmacological stress for diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. Eur J Echocardiogr 2009;10:813–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/ ejechocard/jep084 232. Porter TR, Smith LM, Wu J, Thomas D, Haas JT, Mathers DH, et al. Patient outcome following 2 different stress imaging approaches: a prospective randomized comparison. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:2446–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.019 233. Rinkevich D, Belcik T, Gupta NC, Cannard E, Alkayed NJ, Kaul S. Coronary autoregulation is abnormal in syndrome X: insights using myocardial contrast echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2013;26:290–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2012.12.008 234. Kutty S, Bisselou Moukagna KS, Craft M, Shostrom V, Xie F, Porter TR. Clinical outcome of patients with inducible capillary blood flow abnormalities during demand Downloaded from academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/45/36/3415/7743115 by guest on 07 October 2026