p.113 抽出テキスト

suitable for PCI or CABG. Eur Heart J 2023;44:4310–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/ eurheartj/ehad476 783. Calburean PA, Grebenisan P, Nistor IA, Pal K, Vacariu V, Drincal RK, et al. Prediction of 3-year all-cause and cardiovascular cause mortality in a prospective percutaneous coronary intervention registry: machine learning model outperforms conventional clinical risk scores. Atherosclerosis 2022;350:33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis. 2022.03.028 784. Farooq V, van Klaveren D, Steyerberg EW, Meliga E, Vergouwe Y, Chieffo A, et al. Anatomical and clinical characteristics to guide decision making between coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for individual patients: development and validation of SYNTAX score II. Lancet 2013;381:639–50. https:// doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60108-7 785. Escaned J, Collet C, Ryan N, Luigi De Maria G, Walsh S, Sabate M, et al. Clinical outcomes of state-of-the-art percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with de novo three vessel disease: 1-year results of the SYNTAX II study. Eur Heart J 2017;38: 3124–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx512 786. Cavalcante R, Sotomi Y, Mancone M, Whan Lee C, Ahn JM, Onuma Y, et al. Impact of the SYNTAX scores I and II in patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary disease: a pooled analysis of patient level data from the SYNTAX, PRECOMBAT, and BEST trials. Eur Heart J 2017;38:1969–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx138 787. Hara H, Shiomi H, van Klaveren D, Kent DM, Steyerberg EW, Garg S, et al. External validation of the SYNTAX score II 2020. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021;78:1227–38. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.07.027 788. Modolo R, Chichareon P, van Klaveren D, Dressler O, Zhang Y, Sabik JF, et al. Impact of non-respect of SYNTAX score II recommendation for surgery in patients with left main coronary artery disease treated by percutaneous coronary intervention: an EXCEL substudy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2020;57:676–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/ ejcts/ezz274 789. Takahashi K, Serruys PW, Fuster V, Farkouh ME, Spertus JA, Cohen DJ, et al. Redevelopment and validation of the SYNTAX score II to individualise decision making between percutaneous and surgical revascularisation in patients with complex coronary artery disease: secondary analysis of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAXES trial with external cohort validation. Lancet 2020;396:1399–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32114-0 790. De Silva K, Morton G, Sicard P, Chong E, Indermuehle A, Clapp B, et al. Prognostic utility of BCIS myocardial jeopardy score for classification of coronary disease burden and completeness of revascularization. Am J Cardiol 2013;111:172–7. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.09.012 791. Kapoor JR, Gienger AL, Ardehali R, Varghese R, Perez MV, Sundaram V, et al. Isolated disease of the proximal left anterior descending artery comparing the effectiveness of percutaneous coronary interventions and coronary artery bypass surgery. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2008;1:483–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2008.07.001 792. Thiele H, Neumann-Schniedewind P, Jacobs S, Boudriot E, Walther T, Mohr FW, et al. Randomized comparison of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery versus sirolimus-eluting stenting in isolated proximal left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:2324–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009. 03.032 793. Blazek S, Holzhey D, Jungert C, Borger MA, Fuernau G, Desch S, et al. Comparison of bare-metal stenting with minimally invasive bypass surgery for stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery: 10-year follow-up of a randomized trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013;6:20–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2012.09.008 794. Blazek S, Rossbach C, Borger MA, Fuernau G, Desch S, Eitel I, et al. Comparison of sirolimus-eluting stenting with minimally invasive bypass surgery for stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery: 7-year follow-up of a randomized trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015;8:30–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2014.08.006 795. Thuijs D, Kappetein AP, Serruys PW, Mohr FW, Morice MC, Mack MJ, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: 10-year follow-up of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAX trial. Lancet 2019;394:1325–34. https://doi. org/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31997-x 796. Gianoli M, de Jong AR, Jacob KA, Namba HF, van der Kaaij NP, van der Harst P, et al. Minimally invasive surgery or stenting for left anterior descending artery disease— meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc 2022;40:101046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha. 2022.101046 797. Patel NC, Hemli JM, Seetharam K, Singh VP, Scheinerman SJ, Pirelli L, et al. Minimally invasive coronary bypass versus percutaneous coronary intervention for isolated complex stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022;163:1839–46.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.04.171 798. Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, Colombo A, Holmes DR, Mack MJ, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2009;360:961–72. https://doi.org/10.1056/ NEJMoa0804626 799. Giacoppo D, Colleran R, Cassese S, Frangieh AH, Wiebe J, Joner M, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left main coronary artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Cardiol 2017;2: 1079–88. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2895 800. Palmerini T, Serruys P, Kappetein AP, Genereux P, Riva DD, Reggiani LB, et al. Clinical outcomes with percutaneous coronary revascularization vs coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of 6 randomized trials and 4,686 patients. Am Heart J 2017;190: 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2017.05.005 801. Farkouh ME, Domanski M, Sleeper LA, Siami FS, Dangas G, Mack M, et al. Strategies for multivessel revascularization in patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med 2012;367: 2375–84. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1211585 802. Ahmad Y, Howard JP, Arnold AD, Cook CM, Prasad M, Ali ZA, et al. Mortality after drug-eluting stents vs. coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Heart J 2020;41:3228–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa135 803. Kuno T, Ueyama H, Rao SV, Cohen MG, Tamis-Holland JE, Thompson C, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery for left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J 2020; 227:9–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2020.06.001 804. D’Ascenzo F, De Filippo O, Elia E, Doronzo MP, Omedè P, Montefusco A, et al. Percutaneous vs. surgical revascularization for patients with unprotected left main stenosis: a meta-analysis of 5-year follow-up randomized controlled trials. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes 2021;7:476–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaa041 805. Hildick-Smith D, Egred M, Banning A, Brunel P, Ferenc M, Hovasse T, et al. The European bifurcation club Left Main Coronary Stent study: a randomized comparison of stepwise provisional vs. systematic dual stenting strategies (EBC MAIN). Eur Heart J 2021;42:3829–39. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab283 806. Kandzari DE, Gershlick AH, Serruys PW, Leon MB, Morice MC, Simonton CA, et al. Outcomes among patients undergoing distal left main percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2018;11:e007007. https://doi.org/10.1161/ CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007007 807. Choi KH, Song YB, Lee JM, Park TK, Yang JH, Hahn JY, et al. Prognostic effects of treatment strategies for left main versus non-left main bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention with current-generation drug-eluting stent. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2020;13: e008543. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008543 808. Ninomiya K, Serruys PW, Garg S, Gao C, Masuda S, Lunardi M, et al. Predicted and observed mortality at 10 years in patients with bifurcation lesions in the SYNTAX trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2022;15:1231–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2022.04.025 809. Wang HY, Zhang R, Dou K, Huang Y, Xie L, Qiao Z, et al. Left main bifurcation stenting: impact of residual ischaemia on cardiovascular mortality. Eur Heart J 2023;44: 4324–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad318 810. Holm NR, Andreasen LN, Neghabat O, Laanmets P, Kumsars I, Bennett J, et al. OCT or angiography guidance for PCI in complex bifurcation lesions. N Engl J Med 2023;389: 1477–87. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2307770 811. Xu B, Redfors B, Yang Y, Qiao S, Wu Y, Chen J, et al. Impact of operator experience and volume on outcomes after left main coronary artery percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2016;9:2086–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2016.08. 011 812. Kinnaird T, Gallagher S, Anderson R, Sharp A, Farooq V, Ludman P, et al. Are higher operator volumes for unprotected left main stem percutaneous coronary intervention associated with improved patient outcomes? A survival analysis of 6724 procedures from the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society National Database. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2020;13:e008782. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS. 119.008782 813. Morice MC, Serruys PW, Kappetein AP, Feldman TE, Ståhle E, Colombo A, et al. Five-year outcomes in patients with left main disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting in the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery Trial. Circulation 2014;129:2388–94. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113. 006689 814. Park SJ, Kim YH, Park DW, Yun SC, Ahn JM, Song HG, et al. Randomized trial of stents versus bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2011;364: 1718–27. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1100452 815. Ahn JM, Roh JH, Kim YH, Park DW, Yun SC, Lee PH, et al. Randomized trial of stents versus bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease: 5-year outcomes of the PRECOMBAT study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;65:2198–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jacc.2015.03.033 816. Park DW, Ahn JM, Park H, Yun SC, Kang DY, Lee PH, et al. Ten-year outcomes after drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary disease: extended follow-up of the PRECOMBAT trial. Circulation 2020;141:1437–46. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046039 817. Morice MC, Serruys PW, Kappetein AP, Feldman TE, Ståhle E, Colombo A, et al. Outcomes in patients with de novo left main disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention using paclitaxel-eluting stents or coronary artery bypass graft treatment in the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial. Circulation 2010;121:2645–53. https:// doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.109.899211 818. Kappetein AP, Feldman TE, Mack MJ, Morice MC, Holmes DR, Ståhle E, et al. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with drug-eluting stenting for the treatment

ESC Guidelines                                                                                                                                                                                          3527

Downloaded from academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/45/36/3415/7743115 by guest on 07 October 2026