p.85 抽出テキスト

amiodarone for conversion of acute atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. Am J Cardiol 2000;86:950–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(00)01128-0 565. Reisinger J, Gatterer E, Lang W, Vanicek T, Eisserer G, Bachleitner T, et al. Flecainide versus ibutilide for immediate cardioversion of atrial fibrillation of recent onset. Eur Heart J 2004;25:1318–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehj.2004.04.030 566. Zhang N, Guo JH, Zhang H, Li XB, Zhang P, Xn Y. Comparison of intravenous ibutilide vs. propafenone for rapid termination of recent onset atrial fibrillation. Int J Clin Pract 2005;59:1395–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368-5031.2005.00705.x 567. Camm AJ, Capucci A, Hohnloser SH, Torp-Pedersen C, Van Gelder IC, Mangal B, et al. A randomized active-controlled study comparing the efficacy and safety of vernakalant to amiodarone in recent-onset atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:313–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.07.046 568. Roy D, Pratt CM, Torp-Pedersen C, Wyse DG, Toft E, Juul-Moller S, et al. Vernakalant hydrochloride for rapid conversion of atrial fibrillation: a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Circulation 2008;117:1518–25. https://doi.org/10.1161/ CIRCULATIONAHA.107.723866 569. Deedwania PC, Singh BN, Ellenbogen K, Fisher S, Fletcher R, Singh SN. Spontaneous conversion and maintenance of sinus rhythm by amiodarone in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation: observations from the veterans affairs congestive heart failure survival trial of antiarrhythmic therapy (CHF-STAT). The Department of Veterans Affairs CHF-STAT Investigators. Circulation 1998;98:2574–9. https://doi.org/10.1161/ 01.cir.98.23.2574 570. Hofmann R, Steinwender C, Kammler J, Kypta A, Wimmer G, Leisch F. Intravenous amiodarone bolus for treatment of atrial fibrillation in patients with advanced congestive heart failure or cardiogenic shock. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2004;116:744–9. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s00508-004-0264-0 571. Alboni P, Botto GL, Boriani G, Russo G, Pacchioni F, Iori M, et al. Intravenous administration of flecainide or propafenone in patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation does not predict adverse effects during ‘pill-in-the-pocket’ treatment. Heart 2010; 96:546–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2009.187963 572. Khan IA. Single oral loading dose of propafenone for pharmacological cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:542–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0735-1097(00)01116-5 573. Khan IA. Oral loading single dose flecainide for pharmacological cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol 2003;87:121–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0167-5273(02)00467-9 574. Al-Khatib SM, Allen LaPointe NM, Chatterjee R, Crowley MJ, Dupre ME, Kong DF, et al. Rate- and rhythm-control therapies in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2014;160:760–73. https://doi.org/10.7326/M13-1467 575. Andrade JG, Aguilar M, Atzema C, Bell A, Cairns JA, Cheung CC, et al. The 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Comprehensive Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation. Can J Cardiol 2020;36: 1847–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2020.09.001 576. Lafuente-Lafuente C, Valembois L, Bergmann JF, Belmin J. Antiarrhythmics for maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;3:CD005049. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005049.pub4 577. Valembois L, Audureau E, Takeda A, Jarzebowski W, Belmin J, Lafuente-Lafuente C. Antiarrhythmics for maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;2019:Cd005049. https://doi.org/10.1002/ 14651858.CD005049.pub5 578. Crijns HJ, Van Gelder IC, Van Gilst WH, Hillege H, Gosselink AM, Lie KI. Serial antiarrhythmic drug treatment to maintain sinus rhythm after electrical cardioversion for chronic atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol 1991;68:335–41. https://doi. org/10.1016/0002-9149(91)90828-9 579. Chatterjee S, Sardar P, Lichstein E, Mukherjee D, Aikat S. Pharmacologic rate versus rhythm-control strategies in atrial fibrillation: an updated comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2013;36:122–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j. 1540-8159.2012.03513.x 580. Kotecha D, Kirchhof P. Rate and rhythm control have comparable effects on mortality and stroke in atrial fibrillation but better data are needed. Evid Based Med 2014;19: 222–3. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmed-2014-110062 581. Piccini JP, Hasselblad V, Peterson ED, Washam JB, Califf RM, Kong DF. Comparative efficacy of dronedarone and amiodarone for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:1089–95. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jacc.2009.04.085 582. Eckardt L, Sehner S, Suling A, Borof K, Breithardt G, Crijns H, et al. Attaining sinus rhythm mediates improved outcome with early rhythm control therapy of atrial fibrillation: the EAST-AFNET 4 trial. Eur Heart J 2022;43:4127–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/ eurheartj/ehac471 583. Freemantle N, Lafuente-Lafuente C, Mitchell S, Eckert L, Reynolds M. Mixed treatment comparison of dronedarone, amiodarone, sotalol, flecainide, and propafenone, for the management of atrial fibrillation. Europace 2011;13:329–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/ europace/euq450 584. Frommeyer G, Eckardt L. Drug-induced proarrhythmia: risk factors and electrophysiological mechanisms. Nat Rev Cardiol 2016;13:36–47. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio. 2015.110 585. Kochiadakis GE, Marketou ME, Igoumenidis NE, Chrysostomakis SI, Mavrakis HE, Kaleboubas MD, et al. Amiodarone, sotalol, or propafenone in atrial fibrillation: which is preferred to maintain normal sinus rhythm? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2000;23: 1883–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb07044.x 586. Roy D, Talajic M, Dorian P, Connolly S, Eisenberg MJ, Green M, et al. Amiodarone to prevent recurrence of atrial fibrillation. Canadian Trial of Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. N Engl J Med 2000;342:913–20. https://doi.org/10.1056/ NEJM200003303421302 587. Singh BN, Singh SN, Reda DJ, Tang XC, Lopez B, Harris CL, et al. Amiodarone versus sotalol for atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1861–72. https://doi.org/10.1056/ NEJMoa041705 588. Ehrlich JR, Look C, Kostev K, Israel CW, Goette A. Impact of dronedarone on the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke in atrial fibrillation patients followed in general practices in Germany. Int J Cardiol 2019;278:126–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard. 2018.11.133 589. Singh BN, Connolly SJ, Crijns HJ, Roy D, Kowey PR, Capucci A, et al. Dronedarone for maintenance of sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation or flutter. N Engl J Med 2007;357: 987–99. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa054686 590. Stroobandt R, Stiels B, Hoebrechts R. Propafenone for conversion and prophylaxis of atrial fibrillation. Propafenone Atrial Fibrillation Trial Investigators. Am J Cardiol 1997; 79:418–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(96)00779-5 591. Wazni OM, Dandamudi G, Sood N, Hoyt R, Tyler J, Durrani S, et al. Cryoballoon ablation as initial therapy for atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2021;384:316–24. https://doi. org/10.1056/NEJMoa2029554 592. Cosedis Nielsen J, Johannessen A, Raatikainen P, Hindricks G, Walfridsson H, Kongstad O, et al. Radiofrequency ablation as initial therapy in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2012;367:1587–95. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1113566 593. Morillo CA, Verma A, Connolly SJ, Kuck KH, Nair GM, Champagne J, et al. Radiofrequency ablation vs antiarrhythmic drugs as first-line treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (RAAFT-2): a randomized trial. JAMA 2014;311:692–700. https://doi. org/10.1001/jama.2014.467 594. Kuniss M, Pavlovic N, Velagic V, Hermida JS, Healey S, Arena G, et al. Cryoballoon ablation vs. antiarrhythmic drugs: first-line therapy for patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Europace 2021;23:1033–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euab029 595. Hocini M, Sanders P, Deisenhofer I, Jais P, Hsu LF, Scavee C, et al. Reverse remodeling of sinus node function after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with prolonged sinus pauses. Circulation 2003;108:1172–5. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR. 0000090685.13169.07 596. Inada K, Yamane T, Tokutake K, Yokoyama K, Mishima T, Hioki M, et al. The role of successful catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and prolonged sinus pauses: outcome during a 5-year follow-up. Europace 2014;16:208–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eut159 597. Chen YW, Bai R, Lin T, Salim M, Sang CH, Long DY, et al. Pacing or ablation: which is better for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation-related tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2014;37:403–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.12340 598. Zhang R, Wang Y, Yang M, Yang Y, Wang Z, Yin X, et al. Risk stratification for atrial fibrillation and outcomes in tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome: ablation vs. pacing. Front Cardiovasc Med 2021;8:674471. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.674471 599. Oral H, Pappone C, Chugh A, Good E, Bogun F, Pelosi F, Jr, et al. Circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation for chronic atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2006;354: 934–41. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa050955 600. Yan Huo TG, Schönbauer R, Wójcik M, Fiedler L, Roithinger FX, Martinek M, et al. Low-voltage myocardium-guided ablation trial of persistent atrial fibrillation. NEJM Evid 2022;1:EVIDoa2200141. https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2200141. 601. Reddy VY, Gerstenfeld EP, Natale A, Whang W, Cuoco FA, Patel C, et al. Pulsed field or conventional thermal ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2023; 389:1660–71. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2307291 602. Kalman JM, Al-Kaisey AM, Parameswaran R, Hawson J, Anderson RD, Lim M, et al. Impact of early vs. delayed atrial fibrillation catheter ablation on atrial arrhythmia recurrences. Eur Heart J 2023;44:2447–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad247 603. Kalman JM, Sanders P, Rosso R, Calkins H. Should we perform catheter ablation for asymptomatic atrial fibrillation? Circulation 2017;136:490–9. https://doi.org/10.1161/ CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024926 604. Hunter RJ, Berriman TJ, Diab I, Kamdar R, Richmond L, Baker V, et al. A randomized controlled trial of catheter ablation versus medical treatment of atrial fibrillation in heart failure (the CAMTAF trial). Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2014;7:31–8. https:// doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000806 605. Jones DG, Haldar SK, Hussain W, Sharma R, Francis DP, Rahman-Haley SL, et al. A randomized trial to assess catheter ablation versus rate control in the management of persistent atrial fibrillation in heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:1894–903. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.01.069 606. Kuck KH, Merkely B, Zahn R, Arentz T, Seidl K, Schluter M, et al. Catheter ablation versus best medical therapy in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure: the randomized AMICA trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2019;12: e007731. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007731 Downloaded from academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/45/36/3314/7738779 by guest on 07 October 2026