p.95 抽出テキスト

infarction and proven myocardial viability: primary results of a randomized controlled trial (VIAMI-trial). Trials 2012;13:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-1 433. van Loon RB, Veen G, Baur LH, Twisk JW, van Rossum AC. Long-term follow-up of the viability guided angioplasty after acute myocardial infarction (VIAMI) trial. Int J Cardiol 2015;186:111–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.152 434. Priori SG, Blomström-Lundqvist C, Mazzanti A, Blom N, Borggrefe M, Camm J, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: the Task Force for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). Eur Heart J 2015;36:2793–2867. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv316 435. Ibanez B, Aletras AH, Arai AE, Arheden H, Bax J, Berry C, et al. Cardiac MRI endpoints in myocardial infarction experimental and clinical trials: JACC Scientific Expert Panel. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;74:238–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.05.024 436. Stone GW, Selker HP, Thiele H, Patel MR, Udelson JE, Ohman EM, et al. Relationship between infarct size and outcomes following primary PCI: patient-level analysis from 10 randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;67:1674–1683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jacc.2016.01.069 437. Ibáñez B, Heusch G, Ovize M, Van de Werf F. Evolving therapies for myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;65:1454–1471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jacc.2015.02.032 438. Eitel I, de Waha S, Wöhrle J, Fuernau G, Lurz P, Pauschinger M, et al. Comprehensive prognosis assessment by CMR imaging after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64:1217–1226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.1194 439. Haaf P, Reichlin T, Twerenbold R, Hoeller R, Rubini Gimenez M, Zellweger C, et al. Risk stratification in patients with acute chest pain using three high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays. Eur Heart J 2014;35:365–375. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ eht218 440. Tveit SH, Myhre PL, Hoff NJS, Le TM, Seljeflot I, Røysland R, et al. Superiority of high sensitivity cardiac troponin T vs. I for long-term prognostic value in patients with chest pain; data from the Akershus Cardiac Examination (ACE) 3 study. Clin Biochem 2020; 78:10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2019.12.016 441. Welsh P, Preiss D, Hayward C, Shah ASV, McAllister D, Briggs A, et al. Cardiac troponin T and troponin I in the general population. Circulation 2019;139:2754–2764. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.118.038529 442. Thygesen K, Mair J, Giannitsis E, Mueller C, Lindahl B, Blankenberg S, et al. How to use high-sensitivity cardiac troponins in acute cardiac care. Eur Heart J 2012;33: 2252–2257. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs154 443. Anavekar NS, McMurray JJ, Velazquez EJ, Solomon SD, Kober L, Rouleau J-L, et al. Relation between renal dysfunction and cardiovascular outcomes after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1285–1295. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa041365 444. Thygesen K, Mair J, Mueller C, Huber K, Weber M, Plebani M, et al. Recommendations for the use of natriuretic peptides in acute cardiac care: a position statement from the Study Group on Biomarkers in Cardiology of the ESC Working Group on Acute Cardiac Care. Eur Heart J 2012;33:2001–2006. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ ehq509 445. Ducrocq G, Schulte PJ, Budaj A, Cornel JH, Held C, Himmelmann A, et al. Balancing the risk of spontaneous ischemic and major bleeding events in acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J 2017;186:91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2017.01.010 446. Valgimigli M, Costa F, Lokhnygina Y, Clare RM, Wallentin L, Moliterno DJ, et al. Trade-off of myocardial infarction vs. bleeding types on mortality after acute coronary syndrome: lessons from the Thrombin Receptor Antagonist for Clinical Event Reduction in Acute Coronary Syndrome (TRACER) randomized trial. Eur Heart J 2017;38:804–810. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw525 447. Newby LK, Hasselblad V, Armstrong PW, Van de Werf F, Mark DB, White HD, et al. Time-based risk assessment after myocardial infarction. Implications for timing of discharge and applications to medical decision-making. Eur Heart J 2003;24:182–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0195-668x(02)00301-9 448. Kwok CS, Khan MA, Rao SV, Kinnaird T, Sperrin M, Buchan I, et al. Access and nonaccess site bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention and risk of subsequent mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events: systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2015;8:e001645. https://doi.org/10.1161/ circinterventions.114.001645 449. Ndrepepa G, Neumann FJ, Richardt G, Schulz S, Tölg R, Stoyanov KM, et al. Prognostic value of access and non-access sites bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2013;6:354–361. https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions. 113.000433 450. Rao SV, Cohen MG, Kandzari DE, Bertrand OF, Gilchrist IC. The transradial approach to percutaneous coronary intervention: historical perspective, current concepts, and future directions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:2187–2195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc. 2010.01.039 451. Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, Niemelä K, Xavier D, Widimsky P, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet 2011;377: 1409–1420. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60404-2 452. Valgimigli M, Gagnor A, Calabró P, Frigoli E, Leonardi S, Zaro T, et al. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2015;385:2465–2476. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60292-6 453. Vranckx P, Frigoli E, Rothenbühler M, Tomassini F, Garducci S, Andò G, et al. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2017;38:1069–1080. https://doi.org/10.1093/ eurheartj/ehx048 454. Lee P, Liew D, Brennan A, Stub D, Lefkovits J, Reid CM, et al. Cost-effectiveness of radial access percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome. Am J Cardiol 2021;156:44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.06.034 455. Kerensky RA, Wade M, Deedwania P, Boden WE, Pepine CJ. Revisiting the culprit lesion in non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Results from the VANQWISH trial angiographic core laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:1456–1463. https://doi.org/10.1016/ s0735-1097(02)01770-9 456. Johnson TW, Räber L, di Mario C, Bourantas C, Jia H, Mattesini A, et al. Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 2: acute coronary syndromes, ambiguous coronary angiography findings, and guiding interventional decision-making: an expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. Eur Heart J 2019;40:2566–2584. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz332 457. di Mario C, Koskinas KC, Räber L. Clinical benefit of IVUS guidance for coronary stenting: the ULTIMATE step toward definitive evidence? J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;72: 3138–3141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.029 458. Gao XF, Wang ZM, Wang F, Gu Y, Ge Z, Kong X-Q, et al. Intravascular ultrasound guidance reduces cardiac death and coronary revascularization in patients undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation: results from a meta-analysis of 9 randomized trials and 4724 patients. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;35:239–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10554-019-01555-3 459. Darmoch F, Alraies MC, Al-Khadra Y, Moussa Pacha H, Pinto DS, Osborn EA. Intravascular ultrasound imaging-guided versus coronary angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2020;9:e013678. https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.119.013678 460. Jia H, Dai J, He L, Xu Y, Shi Y, Zhao L, et al. EROSION III: a multicenter RCT of OCT-guided reperfusion in STEMI with early infarct artery patency. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2022;15:846–856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2022.01.298 461. Cuculi F, De Maria GL, Meier P, Dall’Armellina E, de Caterina AR, Channon KM, et al. Impact of microvascular obstruction on the assessment of coronary flow reserve, index of microcirculatory resistance, and fractional flow reserve after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64:1894–1904. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jacc.2014.07.987 462. De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Bartunek J, Kulecki K, Bech J-W, De Winter H, et al. Fractional flow reserve in patients with prior myocardial infarction. Circulation 2001;104: 157–162. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.104.2.157 463. Bønaa KH, Mannsverk J, Wiseth R, Aaberge L, Myreng Y, Nygård O, et al. Drug-eluting or bare-metal stents for coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2016;375:1242–1252. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1607991 464. Räber L, Kelbæk H, Ostojic M, Baumbach A, Heg D, Tüller D, et al. Effect of biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer vs bare-metal stents on cardiovascular events among patients with acute myocardial infarction: the COMFORTABLE AMI randomized trial. JAMA 2012;308:777–787. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012. 10065 465. Sabate M, Cequier A, Iñiguez A, Serra A, Hernandez-Antolin R, Mainar V, et al. Everolimus-eluting stent versus bare-metal stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (EXAMINATION): 1 year results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012;380:1482–1490. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61223-9 466. Sabaté M, Brugaletta S, Cequier A, Iñiguez A, Serra A, Jiménez-Quevedo P, et al. Clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with everolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents (EXAMINATION): 5-year results of a randomised trial. Lancet 2016;387:357–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140- 6736(15)00548-6 467. Brugaletta S, Gomez-Lara J, Ortega-Paz L, Jimenez-Diaz V, Jimenez M, Jiménez-Quevedo P, et al. 10-Year follow-up of patients with everolimus-eluting versus bare-metal stents after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021;77:1165–1178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.12.059 468. Räber L, Yamaji K, Kelbæk H, Engstrøm T, Baumbach A, Roffi M, et al. Five-year clinical outcomes and intracoronary imaging findings of the COMFORTABLE AMI trial: randomized comparison of biodegradable polymer-based biolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2019;40:1909–1919. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz074 469. Vos NS, Fagel ND, Amoroso G, Herrman J-PR, Patterson MS, Piers LH, et al. Paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty versus drug-eluting stent in acute myocardial infarction: the REVELATION randomized trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2019;12: 1691–1699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2019.04.016 470. Scheller B, Ohlow MA, Ewen S, Kische S, Rudolph TK, Clever YP, et al. Bare metal or drug-eluting stent versus drug-coated balloon in non-ST-elevation myocardial Downloaded from academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 by guest on 07 October 2026