p.89 抽出テキスト

209. Fazel R, Joseph TI, Sankardas MA, Pinto DS, Yeh RW, Kumbhani DJ, et al. Comparison of reperfusion strategies for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a multivariate network meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2020;9:e015186. https://doi.org/10. 1161/jaha.119.015186 210. Sinnaeve PR, Armstrong PW, Gershlick AH, Goldstein P, Wilcox R, Lambert Y, et al. ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients randomized to a pharmaco-invasive strategy or primary percutaneous coronary intervention: strategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction (STREAM) 1-year mortality follow-up. Circulation 2014;130:1139–1145. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.114.009570 211. Arbel Y, Ko DT, Yan AT, Cantor WJ, Bagai A, Koh M, et al. Long-term follow-up of the trial of routine angioplasty and stenting after fibrinolysis to enhance reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction (TRANSFER-AMI). Can J Cardiol 2018;34:736–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2018.02.005 212. Di Mario C, Dudek D, Piscione F, Mielecki W, Savonitto S, Murena E, et al. Immediate angioplasty versus standard therapy with rescue angioplasty after thrombolysis in the Combined Abciximab REteplase Stent Study in Acute Myocardial Infarction (CARESS-in-AMI): an open, prospective, randomised, multicentre trial. Lancet 2008; 371:559–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60268-8 213. Bøhmer E, Hoffmann P, Abdelnoor M, Arnesen H, Halvorsen S. Efficacy and safety of immediate angioplasty versus ischemia-guided management after thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction in areas with very long transfer distances results of the NORDISTEMI (NORwegian study on DIstrict treatment of ST-elevation myocardial infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.08. 007 214. Scheller B, Hennen B, Hammer B, Walle J, Hofer C, Hilpert V, et al. Beneficial effects of immediate stenting after thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:634–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00763-0 215. Le May MR, Wells GA, Labinaz M, Davies RF, Turek M, Leddy D, et al. Combined angioplasty and pharmacological intervention versus thrombolysis alone in acute myocardial infarction (CAPITAL AMI study). J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:417–424. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jacc.2005.04.042 216. Abdel-Qadir H, Yan AT, Tan M, Borgia F, Piscione F, Di Mario C, et al. Consistency of benefit from an early invasive strategy after fibrinolysis: a patient-level meta-analysis. Heart 2015;101:1554–1561. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2015-307815 217. Madan M, Halvorsen S, Di Mario C, Tan M, Westerhout CM, Cantor WJ, et al. Relationship between time to invasive assessment and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing an early invasive strategy after fibrinolysis for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a patient-level analysis of the randomized early routine invasive clinical trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015;8:166–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2014.09. 005 218. Andersen HR, Nielsen TT, Rasmussen K, Thuesen L, Kelbaek H, Thayssen P, et al. A comparison of coronary angioplasty with fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2003;349:733–742. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa025142 219. Dalby M, Bouzamondo A, Lechat P, Montalescot G. Transfer for primary angioplasty versus immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. Circulation 2003;108:1809–1814. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.Cir.0000091088.63921. 8c 220. Gierlotka M, Gasior M, Wilczek K, Hawranek M, Szkodzinski J, Paczek P, et al. Reperfusion by primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction within 12 to 24 hours of the onset of symptoms (from a prospective national observational study [PL-ACS]). Am J Cardiol 2011;107:501–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.10.008 221. Busk M, Kaltoft A, Nielsen SS, Bottcher M, Rehling M, Thuesen L, et al. Infarct size and myocardial salvage after primary angioplasty in patients presenting with symptoms for<12 h vs. 12–72 h. Eur Heart J 2009;30:1322–1330. https://doi.org/10.1093/ eurheartj/ehp113 222. Borgia F, Goodman SG, Halvorsen S, Cantor WJ, Piscione F, Le May MR, et al. Early routine percutaneous coronary intervention after fibrinolysis vs. standard therapy in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 2010;31: 2156–2169. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq204 223. D’Souza SP, Mamas MA, Fraser DG, Fath-Ordoubadi F. Routine early coronary angioplasty versus ischaemia-guided angioplasty after thrombolysis in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 2011;32:972–982. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq398 224. Fernandez-Avilés F, Alonso JJ, Castro-Beiras A, Vázquez N, Blanco J, Alonso-Briales J, et al. Routine invasive strategy within 24 hours of thrombolysis versus ischaemiaguided conservative approach for acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation (GRACIA-1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004;364:1045–1053. https:// doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(04)17059-1 225. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, White HD, Dzavik V, Wong SC, Menon V, et al. One-year survival following early revascularization for cardiogenic shock. JAMA 2001;285: 190–192. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.2.190 226. Lemkes JS, Janssens GN, van der Hoeven NW, van de Ven PM, Marques KMJ, Nap A, et al. Timing of revascularization in patients with transient ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a randomized clinical trial. Eur Heart J 2019;40:283–291. https://doi. org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy651 227. Mehta SR, Granger CB, Boden WE, Steg PG, Bassand J-P, Faxon DP, et al. Early versus delayed invasive intervention in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2009;360: 2165–2175. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0807986 228. Kofoed KF, Kelbæk H, Hansen PR, Torp-Pedersen C, Høfsten D, Kløvgaard L, et al. Early versus standard care invasive examination and treatment of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. Circulation 2018;138: 2741–2750. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.118.037152 229. Butt JH, Kofoed KF, Kelbæk H, Hansen PR, Torp-Pedersen C, Høfsten D, et al. Importance of risk assessment in timing of invasive coronary evaluation and treatment of patients with non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome: insights from the VERDICT trial. J Am Heart Assoc 2021;10:e022333. https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha. 121.022333 230. Barbarawi M, Kheiri B, Zayed Y, Barbarawi O, Chahine A, Haykal T, et al. Meta-analysis of optimal timing of coronary intervention in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2020;95:185–193. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd. 28280 231. Vranckx P, White HD, Huang Z, Mahaffey KW, Armstrong PW, Van de Werf F, et al. Validation of BARC bleeding criteria in patients with acute coronary syndromes: the TRACER trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;67:2135–2144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc. 2016.02.056 232. Ndrepepa G, Berger PB, Mehilli J, Seyfarth M, Neumann F-J, Schömig A, et al. Periprocedural bleeding and 1-year outcome after percutaneous coronary interventions: appropriateness of including bleeding as a component of a quadruple end point. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:690–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2007.10.040 233. Urban P, Mehran R, Colleran R, Angiolillo DJ, Byrne RA, Capodanno D, et al. Defining high bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a consensus document from the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk. Eur Heart J 2019;40:2632–2653. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz372 234. Doomun D, Doomun I, Schukraft S, Arroyo D, Cook S, Huwyler T, et al. Ischemic and bleeding outcomes according to the academic research consortium high bleeding risk criteria in all comers treated by percutaneous coronary interventions. Front Cardiovasc Med 2021;8:620354. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.620354 235. Antiplatelet Trialists’ Collaboration. Collaborative overview of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy-I: prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke by prolonged antiplatelet therapy in various categories of patients. BMJ 1994;308:81–106. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.308.6921.81 236. Valgimigli M, Bueno H, Byrne RA, Collet J-P, Costa F, Jeppsson A, et al. 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: the Task Force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 2018;39:213–260. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx419 237. Jones WS, Mulder H, Wruck LM, Pencina MJ, Kripalani S, Muñoz D, et al. Comparative effectiveness of aspirin dosing in cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 2021;384: 1981–1990. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2102137 238. Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, Cannon CP, Emanuelsson H, Held C, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2009;361: 1045–1057. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0904327 239. Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, Montalescot G, Ruzyllo W, Gottlieb S, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2001–2015. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0706482 240. Aradi D, Kirtane A, Bonello L, Gurbel PA, Tantry US, Huber K, et al. Bleeding and stent thrombosis on P2Y12-inhibitors: collaborative analysis on the role of platelet reactivity for risk stratification after percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J 2015;36: 1762–1771. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv104 241. Aradi D, Storey RF, Komócsi A, Trenk D, Gulba D, Kiss RG, et al. Expert position paper on the role of platelet function testing in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J 2014;35:209–215. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht375 242. Gimbel M, Qaderdan K, Willemsen L, Hermanides R, Bergmeijer T, de Vrey E, et al. Clopidogrel versus ticagrelor or prasugrel in patients aged 70 years or older with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (POPular AGE): the randomised, openlabel, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2020;395:1374–1381. https://doi.org/10.1016/ s0140-6736(20)30325-1 243. Husted S, James S, Becker RC, Horrow J, Katus H, Storey RF, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes: a substudy from the prospective randomized PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2012;5:680–688. https://doi.org/10.1161/ circoutcomes.111.964395 244. Schüpke S, Neumann FJ, Menichelli M, Mayer K, Bernlochner I, Wöhrle J, et al. Ticagrelor or prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2019;381:1524–1534. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1908973 245. Montalescot G, van’t Hof AW, Lapostolle F, Silvain J, Lassen JF, Bolognese L, et al. Prehospital ticagrelor in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2014;371:1016–1027. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1407024 246. Koul S, Smith JG, Götberg M, Omerovic E, Alfredsson J, Venetsanos D, et al. No benefit of ticagrelor pretreatment compared with treatment during percutaneous coronary Downloaded from academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 by guest on 07 October 2026