p.88 抽出テキスト
169. Chatterjee S, Chaudhuri D, Vedanthan R, Fuster V, Ibanez B, Bangalore S, et al. Early intravenous beta-blockers in patients with acute coronary syndrome–a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Int J Cardiol 2013;168:915–921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard. 2012.10.050 170. Elgendy IY, Elgendy AY, Mahmoud AN, Mansoor H, Mojadidi MK, Bavry AA, et al. Intravenous β-blockers for patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Int J Cardiol 2016;223:891–897. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.08.293 171. García-Prieto J, Villena-Gutiérrez R, Gómez M, Bernardo E, Pun-García A, García-Lunar I, et al. Neutrophil stunning by metoprolol reduces infarct size. Nat Commun 2017;8:14780. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14780 172. Stub D, Smith K, Bernard S, Nehme Z, Stephenson M, Bray JE, et al. Air versus oxygen in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation 2015;131:2143–2150. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.114.014494 173. Widimsky P, Wijns W, Fajadet J, de Belder M, Knot J, Aaberge L, et al. Reperfusion therapy for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction in Europe: description of the current situation in 30 countries. Eur Heart J 2010;31:943–957. https://doi.org/10.1093/ eurheartj/ehp492 174. Hall M, Laut K, Dondo TB, Alabas OA, Brogan RA, Gutacker N, et al. Patient and hospital determinants of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in England, 2003– 2013. Heart 2016;102:313–319. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308616 175. Widimsky P, Fajadet J, Danchin N, Wijns W. “Stent 4 Life” targeting PCI at all who will benefit the most. A joint project between EAPCI, Euro-PCR, EUCOMED and the ESC Working Group on Acute Cardiac Care. EuroIntervention 2009;4:555–557. doi: doi:10. 4244/EIJV4I5A94 176. Pinto DS, Kirtane AJ, Nallamothu BK, Murphy SA, Cohen DJ, Laham RJ, et al. Hospital delays in reperfusion for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: implications when selecting a reperfusion strategy. Circulation 2006;114:2019–2025. https://doi.org/10.1161/ circulationaha.106.638353 177. Steg PG, Cambou JP, Goldstein P, Durand E, Sauval P, Kadri Z, et al. Bypassing the emergency room reduces delays and mortality in ST elevation myocardial infarction: the USIC 2000 registry. Heart 2006;92:1378–1383. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2006. 101972 178. Baran KW, Kamrowski KA, Westwater JJ, Tschida VH, Alexander CF, Beahrs MM, et al. Very rapid treatment of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: utilizing prehospital electrocardiograms to bypass the emergency department. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2010;3:431–437. https://doi.org/10.1161/circoutcomes.110.942631 179. Huynh T, Perron S, O’Loughlin J, Joseph L, Labrecque M, Tu JV, et al. Comparison of primary percutaneous coronary intervention and fibrinolytic therapy in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: Bayesian hierarchical meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Circulation 2009;119: 3101–3109. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.108.793745 180. Nallamothu BK, Bates ER. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction: is timing (almost) everything? Am J Cardiol 2003;92: 824–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(03)00891-9 181. Betriu A, Masotti M. Comparison of mortality rates in acute myocardial infarction treated by percutaneous coronary intervention versus fibrinolysis. Am J Cardiol 2005;95: 100–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.08.069 182. Boersma E. Does time matter? A pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing primary percutaneous coronary intervention and in-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction patients. Eur Heart J 2006;27:779–788. https://doi.org/10.1093/ eurheartj/ehi810 183. Pinto DS, Frederick PD, Chakrabarti AK, Kirtane AJ, Ullman E, Dejam A, et al. Benefit of transferring ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients for percutaneous coronary intervention compared with administration of onsite fibrinolytic declines as delays increase. Circulation 2011;124:2512–2521. https://doi.org/10.1161/ circulationaha.111.018549 184. Armstrong PW, Gershlick AH, Goldstein P, Wilcox R, Danays T, Lambert Y, et al. Fibrinolysis or primary PCI in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2013;368:1379–1387. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1301092 185. Gershlick AH, Stephens-Lloyd A, Hughes S, Abrams KR, Stevens SE, Uren NG, et al. Rescue angioplasty after failed thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2005;353:2758–2768. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa050849 186. Cantor WJ, Fitchett D, Borgundvaag B, Ducas J, Heffernan M, Cohen EA, et al. Routine early angioplasty after fibrinolysis for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2009; 360:2705–2718. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0808276 187. Wijeysundera HC, Vijayaraghavan R, Nallamothu BK, Foody JoAnne M, Krumholz HM, Phillips CO, et al. Rescue angioplasty or repeat fibrinolysis after failed fibrinolytic therapy for ST-segment myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:422–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.09.033 188. Sutton AG, Campbell PG, Graham R, Price DJA, Gray JC, Grech ED, et al. A randomized trial of rescue angioplasty versus a conservative approach for failed fibrinolysis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the Middlesbrough Early Revascularization to Limit INfarction (MERLIN) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44: 287–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2003.12.059 189. Schömig A, Mehilli J, Antoniucci D, Ndrepepa G, Markwardt C, Di Pede F, et al. Mechanical reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting more than 12 hours from symptom onset: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005;293: 2865–2872. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.23.2865 190. Ndrepepa G, Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Antoniucci D, Schömig A. Mechanical reperfusion and long-term mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting 12 to 48 hours from onset of symptoms. JAMA 2009;301:487–488. https://doi.org/10. 1001/jama.2009.32 191. Bouisset F, Gerbaud E, Bataille V, Coste P, Puymirat E, Belle L, et al. Percutaneous myocardial revascularization in late-presenting patients with STEMI. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021; 78:1291–1305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.07.039 192. Hochman JS, Lamas GA, Buller CE, Dzavik V, Reynolds HR, Abramsky SJ, et al. Coronary intervention for persistent occlusion after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2395–2407. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa066139 193. Menon V, Pearte CA, Buller CE, Steg PhG, Forman SA, White HD, et al. Lack of benefit from percutaneous intervention of persistently occluded infarct arteries after the acute phase of myocardial infarction is time independent: insights from Occluded Artery Trial. Eur Heart J 2009;30:183–191. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehn486 194. Ioannidis JPA, Katritsis DG. Percutaneous coronary intervention for late reperfusion after myocardial infarction in stable patients. Am Heart J 2007;154:1065–1071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2007.07.049 195. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, Funck-Brentano C, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 2020;41:407–477. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425 196. O’Donoghue M, Boden WE, Braunwald E, Cannon CP, Clayton TC, de Winter RJ, et al. Early invasive vs conservative treatment strategies in women and men with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2008;300:71–80. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.1.71 197. Mehta SR, Cannon CP, Fox KAA, Wallentin L, Boden WE, Spacek R, et al. Routine vs selective invasive strategies in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials. JAMA 2005;293:2908–2917. https://doi.org/10. 1001/jama.293.23.2908 198. Fox KA, Clayton TC, Damman P, Pocock SJ, de Winter RJ, Tijssen JGP, et al. Long-term outcome of a routine versus selective invasive strategy in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome a meta-analysis of individual patient data. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:2435–2445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03. 007 199. Fanning JP, Nyong J, Scott IA, Aroney CN, Walters DL. Routine invasive strategies versus selective invasive strategies for unstable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in the stent era. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;2016:CD004815. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004815.pub4 200. Elgendy IY, Mahmoud AN, Wen X, Bavry AA. Meta-analysis of randomized trials of long-term all-cause mortality in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome managed with routine invasive versus selective invasive strategies. Am J Cardiol 2017;119:560–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.11.005 201. Navarese EP, Gurbel PA, Andreotti F, Tantry U, Jeong Y-H, Kozinski M, et al. Optimal timing of coronary invasive strategy in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2013;158:261–270. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-4-201302190-00006 202. Jobs A, Mehta SR, Montalescot G, Vicaut E, van’t Hof AWJ, Badings EA, et al. Optimal timing of an invasive strategy in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 2017;390:737–746. https://doi. org/10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31490-3 203. Kite TA, Kurmani SA, Bountziouka V, Cooper NJ, Lock ST, Gale CP, et al. Timing of invasive strategy in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Heart J 2022;43:3148–3161. https://doi.org/10.1093/ eurheartj/ehac213 204. Eggers KM, James SK, Jernberg T, Lindahl B. Timing of coronary angiography in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: long-term clinical outcomes from the nationwide SWEDEHEART registry. EuroIntervention 2022;18:582–589. https:// doi.org/10.4244/eij-d-21-00982 205. Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction: collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomised trials of more than 1000 patients. Lancet 1994;343:311–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0140-6736(94)91161-4 206. Morrison LJ, Verbeek PR, McDonald AC, Sawadsky BV, Cook DJ. Mortality and prehospital thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2000; 283:2686–2692. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.20.2686 207. Steg PG, Bonnefoy E, Chabaud S, Lapostolle F, Dubien P-Y, Cristofini P, et al. Impact of time to treatment on mortality after prehospital fibrinolysis or primary angioplasty: data from the CAPTIM randomized clinical trial. Circulation 2003;108:2851–2856. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.Cir.0000103122.10021.F2 208. ASSENT-4 PCI Investigators. Primary versus tenecteplase-facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (ASSENT-4 PCI): randomised trial. Lancet 2006;367:569–578. https://doi.org/10. 1016/s0140-6736(06)68147-6 ESC Guidelines 3807 Downloaded from academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 by guest on 07 October 2026