GL検索 v0.1.0
画像は 68 ページを描画したものです
page 68

p.68 抽出テキスト

Sleep evaluation Screening for SAS is recommended in patients with symptoms of SAS and in the presence of severe bradycardia or advanced AVB during sleep. I C Recommendation for implantable loop recorder In patients with infrequent (less than once a month) unexplained syncope or other symptoms suspected to be caused by bradycardia in whom a comprehensive evaluation did not demonstrate a cause, long-term ambulatory monitoring with an ILR is recommended. I A Cardiac pacing for bradycardia and conduction system disease In patients with SND and a DDD pacemaker, minimization of unnecessary ventricular pacing through programming is recommended. I A Pacing is indicated in SND when symptoms can clearly be attributed to bradyarrhythmias. I B Pacing is indicated in symptomatic patients with the bradycardiatachycardia form of SND to correct bradyarrhythmias and enable pharmacological treatment, unless ablation of the tachyarrhythmia is preferred. I B Pacing is not recommended in patients with bradyarrhythmias related to SND which are asymptomatic or due to transient causes that can be corrected and prevented. III C Pacing is indicated in patients in SR with permanent or paroxysmal third- or second-degree type 2, infranodal 2:1, or highdegree AVB, irrespective of symptoms.e I C Pacing is indicated in patients with atrial arrhythmia (mainly AF) and permanent or paroxysmal third- or high-degree AVB, irrespective of symptoms. I C In patients with permanent AF in need of a pacemaker, ventricular pacing with rate response function is recommended. I C Pacing is not recommended in patients with AVB due to transient causes that can be corrected and prevented. III C In patients with unexplained syncope and bifascicular block, a pacemaker is indicated in the presence of either a baseline HV interval of >_70 ms, second- or third-degree intra- or infra-Hisian block during incremental atrial pacing, or abnormal response to pharmacological challenge. I B Pacing is indicated in patients with alternating BBB with or without symptoms. I C Pacing is not recommended for asymptomatic BBB or bifascicular block. III B Recommendations for pacing for reflex syncope Dual-chamber cardiac pacing is indicated to reduce recurrent syncope in patients aged >40 years, with severe, unpredictable, recurrent syncope who have: • spontaneous documented symptomatic asystolic pause(s) >3 s or asymptomatic pause(s) >6 s due to sinus arrest or AVB; or • cardioinhibitory carotid sinus syndrome; or • asystolic syncope during tilt testing. I A Cardiac pacing is not indicated in the absence of a documented cardioinhibitory reflex. III B Pacing is not recommended in patients with unexplained falls in the absence of any other documented indication. III B Pacing is not recommended in patients with unexplained syncope without evidence of SND or conduction disturbance. III C CRT CRT is recommended for symptomatic patients with HF in SR with LVEF <_35%, QRS duration >_150 ms, and LBBB QRS morphology despite OMT, to improve symptoms and reduce morbidity and mortality. I A CRT is not indicated in patients with HF and a QRS duration <130 ms without indication for RV pacing. III A In patients with symptomatic AF and an uncontrolled heart rate who are candidates for AVJ ablation (irrespective of QRS duration), CRT is recommended in patients with HFrEF. I B CRT rather than RV pacing is recommended for patients with HFrEF (<40%) regardless of NYHA class who have an indication for ventricular pacing and high-degree AVB in order to reduce morbidity. This includes patients with AF. I A In patients who are candidates for an ICD, and who have CRT indication, implantation of a CRT-D is recommended. I A Recommendations for using His bundle pacing In patients treated with His bundle pacing, device programming tailored to specific requirements of His bundle pacing is recommended. I C Pacing in acute myocardial infarction Implantation of a permanent pacemaker is indicated with the same recommendations as in a general population (section 5.2) when AVB does not resolve within a waiting period of at least 5 days after MI. I C Pacing is not recommended if AVB resolves after revascularization or spontaneously. III B

Continued Downloaded from academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/35/3427/6358547 by guest on 07 October 2026