p.75 抽出テキスト

Kusumoto et al 2018 Bradycardia Clinical Practice Guidelines

August 20, 2019 Circulation. 2019;140:e382–e482. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000628 e456

CLINICAL STATEMENTS AND GUIDELINES S4.2.3-17.	Linzer M, Pritchett EL, Pontinen M, et al. Incremental diagnostic

yield of loop electrocardiographic recorders in unexplained syncope. Am J Cardiol. 1990;66:214–9. S4.2.3-18.	Subbiah R, Chia PL, Gula LJ, et al. Cardiac monitoring in patients with syncope: making that elusive diagnosis. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2013;9:299–307. S4.2.3-19.	Shen WK, Sheldon RS, Benditt DG, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline for the evaluation and management of patients with syncope: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2017;136:e60–122. S4.2.3-20.	Brignole M, Vardas P, Hoffman E, et al. Indications for the use of

diagnostic implantable and external ECG loop recorders. Europace. 2009;11:671–87.

4.2.4 Imaging in Patients With Documented or Suspected Bradycardia or Conduction Disorders

S4.2.4-1.	 Schneider JF, Thomas HE Jr, Kreger BE, et al. Newly acquired left bundle-branch block: the Framingham study. Ann Intern Med. 1979;90:303–10. S4.2.4-2.	 Schneider JF, Thomas HE Jr, Sorlie P, et al. Comparative features of newly acquired left and right bundle branch block in the general population: the Framingham study. Am J Cardiol. 1981;47:931–40. S4.2.4-3.	 Talreja D, Gruver C, Sklenar J, et al. Efficient utilization of echocardiography for the assessment of left ventricular systolic function. Am Heart J. 2000;139:394–8. S4.2.4-4.	 Dhingra R, Ho Nam B, Benjamin EJ, et al. Cross-sectional relations of electrocardiographic QRS duration to left ventricular dimensions: the Framingham Heart Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:685–9. S4.2.4-5.	 Dhingra R, Pencina MJ, Wang TJ, et al. Electrocardiographic QRS duration and the risk of congestive heart failure: the Framingham Heart Study. Hypertension. 2006;47:861–7. S4.2.4-6.	 Badheka AO, Singh V, Patel NJ, et al. QRS duration on electrocardiography and cardiovascular mortality (from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey-III). Am J Cardiol. 2013;112:671–7. S4.2.4-7.	 Bogale N, Orn S, James M, et al. Usefulness of either or both left and right bundle branch block at baseline or during follow-up for predicting death in patients following acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99:647–50. S4.2.4-8.	 Eriksson P, Hansson PO, Eriksson H, et al. Bundle-branch block in a general male population: the study of men born 1913. Circulation. 1998;98:2494–500. S4.2.4-9.	 Fahy GJ, Pinski SL, Miller DP, et al. Natural history of isolated bundle branch block. Am J Cardiol. 1996;77:1185–90. S4.2.4-10.	Imanishi R, Seto S, Ichimaru S, et al. Prognostic significance of incident complete left bundle branch block observed over a 40-year period. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:644–8. S4.2.4-11.	Chiu DT, Shapiro NI, Sun BC, et al. Are echocardiography, telemetry, ambulatory electrocardiography monitoring, and cardiac enzymes in emergency department patients presenting with syncope useful tests? A preliminary investigation. J Emerg Med. 2014;47: 113–8. S4.2.4-12.	Douglas PS, Garcia MJ, Haines DE, et al. ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/ HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR 2011 appropriate use criteria for echocardiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Society of Echocardiography, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance American College of Chest Physicians. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011;24:229–67. S4.2.4-13.	Menozzi C, Brignole M, Alboni P, et al. The natural course of untreated sick sinus syndrome and identification of the variables predictive of unfavorable outcome. Am J Cardiol. 1998;82:1205–9. S4.2.4-14.	Bluemke DA, Achenbach S, Budoff M, et al. Noninvasive coronary

artery imaging: magnetic resonance angiography and multidetector computed tomography angiography: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease in the Young. Circulation. 2008;118:586–606. S4.2.4-15.	Bokhari S, Castano A, Pozniakoff T, et al. (99m) Tc-pyrophosphate

scintigraphy for differentiating light-chain cardiac amyloidosis from the transthyretin-related familial and senile cardiac amyloidoses. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:195–201. S4.2.4-16.	Cheong B, Huber S, Muthupillai R, et al. Evaluation of myocardial iron overload by T(2)* cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Tex Heart Inst J. 2005;32:448–9. S4.2.4-17.	Fontana M, Pica S, Reant P, et al. Prognostic value of late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance in cardiac amyloidosis. Circulation. 2015;132:1570–9. S4.2.4-18.	Franco A, Javidi S, Ruehm SG. Delayed myocardial enhancement in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Radiol Case Rep. 2015;9:6–18. S4.2.4-19.	Greulich S, Deluigi CC, Gloekler S, et al. CMR imaging predicts death and other adverse events in suspected cardiac sarcoidosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:501–11. S4.2.4-20.	Haq M, Pawar S, Berk JL, et al. Can 99mTc-pyrophosphate aid in early detection of cardiac involvement in asymptomatic variant TTR amyloidosis? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10:713–4. S4.2.4-21.	Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM, et al. ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Circulation. 2010;122:e525–55. S4.2.4-22.	Mendu ML, McAvay G, Lampert R, et al. Yield of diagnostic tests in evaluating syncopal episodes in older patients. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1299–305. S4.2.4-23.	Recchia D, Barzilai B. Echocardiography in the evaluation of patients with syncope. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:649–55. S4.2.4-24.	Sarasin FP, Junod AF, Carballo D, et al. Role of echocardiography in the evaluation of syncope: a prospective study. Heart. 2002;88:363–7. S4.2.4-25.	Dagres N, Bongiorni MG, Dobreanu D, et al. Current investigation and management of patients with syncope: results of the European Heart Rhythm Association survey. Europace. 2013;15:1812–5. S4.2.4-26.	Rabkin SW, Mathewson FA, Tate RB. Natural history of left bundlebranch block. Br Heart J. 1980;43:164–9. S4.2.4-27.	Zhang ZM, Rautaharju PM, Soliman EZ, et al. Mortality risk associated with bundle branch blocks and related repolarization abnormalities (from the Women’s Health Initiative [WHI]). Am J Cardiol. 2012;110:1489–95. S4.2.4-28.	Lamb LE, Kable KD, Averill KH. Electrocardiographic findings in 67 375 asymptomatic subjects. V. Left bundle branch block. Am J Cardiol. 1960;6:130–42. S4.2.4-29.	Rotman M, Triebwasser JH. A clinical and follow-up study of right and left bundle branch block. Circulation. 1975;51:477–84. S4.2.4-30.	Al Rajoub B, Noureddine S, El Chami S, et al. The prognostic value of a new left bundle branch block in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Lung. 2017;46:85–91. S4.2.4-31.	Iuliano S, Fisher SG, Karasik PE, et al. QRS duration and mortality in patients with congestive heart failure. Am Heart J. 2002;143: 1085–91. S4.2.4-32.	Kumar V, Venkataraman R, Aljaroudi W, et al. Implications of left bundle branch block in patient treatment. Am J Cardiol. 2013;111:291–300. S4.2.4-33.	Shamim W, Francis DP, Yousufuddin M, et al. Intraventricular conduction delay: a prognostic marker in chronic heart failure. Int J Cardiol. 1999;70:171–8. S4.2.4-34.	Baldasseroni S, Opasich C, Gorini M, et al. Left bundle-branch block is associated with increased 1-year sudden and total mortality rate in 5517 outpatients with congestive heart failure: a report from the Italian network on congestive heart failure. Am Heart J. 2002;143:398–405. S4.2.4-35.	Erne P, Iglesias JF, Urban P, et al. Left bundle-branch block in patients

with acute myocardial infarction: Presentation, treatment, and trends in outcome from 1997 to 2016 in routine clinical practice. Am Heart J. 2017;184:106–13.

Downloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on October 7, 2026