p.82 抽出テキスト

CLINICAL STATEMENTS AND GUIDELINES

April 1, 2025 Circulation. 2025;151:e771–e862. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001309 e852

10.4. Noninvasive Diagnostic Testing Prior to Hospital Discharge 1.	 Daneault B, Genereux P, Kirtane AJ, et al. Comparison of three-year outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <40% versus ≥ 40% (from the HORIZONS- AMI trial). Am J Cardiol. 2013;111:12–20. 2.	 Dokainish H, Rajaram M, Prabhakaran D, et al. Incremental value of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function to determine outcome in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the echocardiographic substudy of the OASIS-6 trial. Echocardiography. 2014;31:569–578. 3.	 Ng VG, Lansky AJ, Meller S, et al. The prognostic importance of left ventricular function in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the HORIZONS-AMI trial. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2014;3:67– 77. 4.	 Damluji AA, van Diepen S, Katz JN, et al. Mechanical complications of acute myocardial infarction: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021;144:e16–e35. 5.	 McCarthy CP, Vaduganathan M, McCarthy KJ, et al. Left ventricular thrombus after acute myocardial infarction: screening, prevention, and treatment. JAMA Cardiol. 2018;3:642–649. 6.	 Ibanez B, Aletras AH, Arai AE, et al. Cardiac MRI endpoints in myocardial infarction experimental and clinical trials: JACC Scientific Expert Panel. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74:238–256. 7.	 Pontone G, Guaricci AI, Andreini D, et al. Prognostic stratification of patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (PROSPECT): a cardiac magnetic resonance study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10:e006428. 8.	 Bulluck H, Dharmakumar R, Arai AE, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: recent advances, controversies, and future directions. Circulation. 2018;137:1949–1964. 9.	 Tamis-Holland JE, Jneid H, Reynolds HR, et al. Contemporary diagnosis and

management of patients with myocardial infarction in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019;139:e891–e908. 10.5.1. Patient Education 1.	 Kourbelis CM, Marin TS, Foote J, et al. Effectiveness of discharge education strategies versus usual care on clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndrome patients: a systematic review. JBI Evid Synth. 2020;18:309–331. 2.	 Feng YY, Chaves GSS, Shi W, et al. Education interventions in Chinese cardiac patients on health behaviours, disease-related knowledge, and health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Patient Educ Couns. 2021;104:1018–1029. 3.	 Shi W, Ghisi GLM, Zhang L, et al. Systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression to determine the effects of patient education on health behaviour change in adults diagnosed with coronary heart disease. J Clin Nurs. 2023;32:5300–5327. 4.	 Piekarz H, Langran C, Raza A, Donyai P. Medication-taking for secondary prevention of acute myocardial infarction: a thematic meta-synthesis of patient experiences. Open Heart. 2022;9:e001939. 5.	 American Heart Association. Life’s Essential 8. Accessed September, 2023.

https://www.heart.org/en/healthy-living/healthy-lifestyle/lifes-essential-8. 10.5.2. Postdischarge Follow-Up and Systems of Care Coordination 1.	 Dreyer RP, Dharmarajan K, Kennedy KF, et al. Sex differences in 1-year all-cause rehospitalization in patients after acute myocardial infarction: a prospective observational study. Circulation. 2017;135:521–531. 2.	 O’Brien C, Valsdottir L, Wasfy JH, et al. Comparison of 30-day readmission rates after hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction in men versus women. Am J Cardiol. 2017;120:1070–1076. 3.	 Cholack G, Garfein J, Krallman R, et al. Predictors of early (0-7 days) and late (8-30 days) readmission in a cohort of acute coronary syndrome patients. Int J Med Stud. 2022;10:38–48. 4.	 Boulos PK, Messenger JC, Waldo SW. Readmission after ACS: burden, epidemiology, and mitigation. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022;24:807–815. 5.	 Oliveira L, Costa I, Silva DGD, et al. Readmission of patients with acute coronary syndrome and determinants. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2019;113:42–49. 6.	 Gudnadottir GS, Gudnason T, Wilhelmson K, et al. Multimorbidity and readmissions in older people with acute coronary syndromes. Cardiology. 2022;147:121–132. 7.	 American College of Cardiology. Hospital to Home Initiative: Quality Cam-

paign. Accessed September 18, 2023. https://cvquality.acc.org/initiatives/ hospital-to-home. 8 American Heart Association. Acute Myocardial Infarction Toolkit. Accessed

September 16, 2023. https://www.heart.org/en/health-topics/heart-attack/ heart-attack-tools-and-resources/acute-myocardial-infarction-toolkit. 9.	 Bettger JP, Alexander KP, Dolor RJ, et al. Transitional care after hospitalization for acute stroke or myocardial infarction: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157:407–416. 10.	 Albert N, Gluckman, TJ, McNamara, R, et al. Abstract 102: the association of patient navigator program features and hospital strategies with processes and outcome metrics in acute myocardial infarction and heart failure. 2019. Accessed September 23, 2023. https://www.ahajournals.org/ doi/10.1161/hcq.12.suppl_1.102. 11.	 Hoo JX, Yang YF, Tan JY, et al. Impact of multicomponent integrated care on mortality and hospitalization after acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2023;9:258– 267. 12.	 Virani SS, Newby LK, Arnold SV, et al. 2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/

NLA/PCNA guideline for the management of patients with chronic coronary disease: a report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2023;148:e9–e119. 10.5.3. Cardiac Rehabilitation 1.	 Dibben G, Faulkner J, Oldridge N, et al. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;11:CD001800. 2.	 Anderson L, Oldridge N, Thompson DR, et al. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease: Cochrane systematic review and metaanalysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:1–12. 3.	 Anderson L, Thompson DR, Oldridge N, et al. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2016:CD001800. 4.	 Dibben GO, Faulkner J, Oldridge N, et al. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:452– 469. 5.	 Snoek JA, Prescott EI, van der Velde AE, et al. Effectiveness of home-based mobile guided cardiac rehabilitation as alternative strategy for nonparticipation in clinic-based cardiac rehabilitation among elderly patients in Europe: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2021;6:463–468. 6.	 Li Z, Hui Z, Zheng Y, et al. Efficacy of phase II remote home rehabilitation in patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022;2022:4634769. 7.	 Campo G, Tonet E, Chiaranda G, et al. Exercise intervention improves quality of life in older adults after myocardial infarction: randomised clinical trial. Heart. 2020;106:1658–1664. 8.	 Ritchey MD, Maresh S, McNeely J, et al. Tracking cardiac rehabilitation participation and completion among Medicare beneficiaries to inform the efforts of a national initiative. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020;13:e005902. 9.	 Schultz WM, Kelli HM, Lisko JC, et al. Socioeconomic status and cardiovascular outcomes: challenges and interventions. Circulation. 2018;137:2166– 2178. 10.	 Takura T, Ebata-Kogure N, Goto Y, et al. Cost-effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation in patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Cardiol Res Pract. 2019;2019:1840894. 11.	 McMahon SR, Ades PA, Thompson PD. The role of cardiac rehabilitation in patients with heart disease. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2017;27:420–425. 12.	 Grace SL, Russell KL, Reid RD, et al. Effect of cardiac rehabilitation referral strategies on utilization rates: a prospective, controlled study. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:235–241. 13.	 Thomas RJ, Beatty AL, Beckie TM, et al. Home-based cardiac rehabilitation: a scientific statement from the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, the American Heart Association, and the American College of Cardiology. Circulation. 2019;140:e69–e89. 14.	 Nkonde-Price C, Reynolds K, Najem M, et al. Comparison of home-based vs center-based cardiac rehabilitation in hospitalization, medication adherence, and risk factor control among patients with cardiovascular disease. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5:e2228720. 15.	 Huang K, Liu W, He D, et al. Telehealth interventions versus center-based cardiac rehabilitation of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015;22:959–971. 16.	 Zeng W, Stason WB, Fournier S, et al. Benefits and costs of intensive lifestyle modification programs for symptomatic coronary disease in Medicare beneficiaries. Am Heart J. 2013;165:785–792. 17.	 Freeman AM, Taub PR, Lo HC, Ornish D. Intensive cardiac rehabilitation: an

underutilized resource. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019;21:19.

Downloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on October 7, 2026