GL検索 v0.1.0
画像は 66 ページを描画したものです
page 66

p.66 抽出テキスト

CLINICAL STATEMENTS AND GUIDELINES

April 1, 2025 Circulation. 2025;151:e771–e862. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001309 e836

2.1. Definition and Classification of ACS 1.	 Libby P. Mechanisms of acute coronary syndromes and their implications for therapy. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:2004–2013. 2.	 Falk E, Nakano M, Bentzon JF, et al. Update on acute coronary syndromes: the pathologists’ view. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:719–728. 3.	 Bhatt DL, Lopes RD, Harrington RA. Diagnosis and treatment of acute coronary syndromes: a review. JAMA. 2022;327:662–675. 4.	 Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:2231–2264. 5.	 Gulati M, Levy PD, Mukherjee D, et al. 2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/ SAEM/SCCT/SCMR guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2021;144:e368–e454. 6.	 Hayes SN, Kim ESH, Saw J, et al. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: current state of the science: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;137:e523–e557. 7.	 Tamis-Holland JE, Jneid H, Reynolds HR, et al. Contemporary diagnosis and management of patients with myocardial infarction in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019;139:e891–e908. 8.	 DeFilippis AP, Chapman AR, Mills NL, et al. Assessment and treatment of patients with type 2 myocardial infarction and acute nonischemic myocardial injury. Circulation. 2019;140:1661–1678. 9.	 Jernberg T, Hasvold P, Henriksson M, et al. Cardiovascular risk in postmyocardial infarction patients: nationwide real world data demonstrate the importance of a long-term perspective. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:1163–1170. 10.	 Virani SS, Newby LK, Arnold SV, et al. 2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/ NLA/PCNA guideline for the management of patients with chronic coronary disease: a report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2023;148:e9–e119. 11.	 Kontos MC, de Lemos JA, Deitelzweig SB, et al. 2022 ACC expert consensus decision pathway on the evaluation and disposition of acute chest pain in the emergency department: a report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;80:1925– 1960. 12.	 Wang K, Asinger RW, Marriott HJ. ST-segment elevation in conditions other than acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2128–2135. 13.	 Birnbaum Y, Ye Y, Smith SW, Jneid H. Rapid diagnosis of stemi equivalent

in patients with left bundle-branch block: Is it feasible? J Am Heart Assoc 2021;10:e023275. 3.1.1. Prehospital Assessment and Management Considerations for Suspected ACS 1.	 Nakashima T, Hashiba K, Kikuchi M, et al. Impact of prehospital 12-lead electrocardiography and destination hospital notification on mortality in patients with chest pain- a systematic review. Circ Rep. 2022;4:187–193. 2.	 Quinn T, Johnsen S, Gale CP, et al. Effects of prehospital 12-lead ECG on processes of care and mortality in acute coronary syndrome: a linked cohort study from the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project. Heart. 2014;100:944–950. 3.	 Verbeek PR, Ryan D, Turner L, Craig AM. Serial prehospital 12-lead electrocardiograms increase identification of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2012;16:109–114. 4.	 Tanguay A, Lebon J, Lau L, et al. Detection of STEMI using prehospital serial 12-lead electrocardiograms. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018;22:419–426. 5.	 Rokos IC, French WJ, Koenig WJ, et al. Integration of pre-hospital electrocardiograms and ST-elevation myocardial infarction receiving center (SRC) networks: impact on door-to-balloon times across 10 independent regions. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2009;2:339–346. 6.	 Sorensen JT, Terkelsen CJ, Norgaard BL, et al. Urban and rural implementation of pre-hospital diagnosis and direct referral for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:430–436. 7.	 Le May MR, Wells GA, So DY, et al. Reduction in mortality as a result of direct transport from the field to a receiving center for primary percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1223–1230. 8.	 Nam J, Caners K, Bowen JM, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the benefits of out-of-hospital 12-lead ECG and advance notification in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2014;64:176-186, 186.e171–179. 9.	 Shavadia JS, Roe MT, Chen AY, et al. Association between cardiac cath-

eterization laboratory pre-activation and reperfusion timing metrics and out- comes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the ACTION registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:1837–1847. 10.	 Gulati M, Levy PD, Mukherjee D, et al. 2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/

SAEM/SCCT/SCMR guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2021;144:e368–e454. 11.	 Jollis JG, Al-Khalidi HR, Roettig ML, et al. Impact of regionalization of STsegment-elevation myocardial infarction care on treatment times and outcomes for emergency medical services: transported patients presenting to hospitals with percutaneous coronary intervention: Mission: Lifeline Accelerator-2. Circulation. 2018;137:376–387. 12.	 Mathews R, Peterson ED, Li S, et al. Use of emergency medical service transport among patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: findings from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get With The Guidelines. Circulation. 2011;124:154–163. 13.	 Becker L, Larsen MP, Eisenberg MS. Incidence of cardiac arrest during selftransport for chest pain. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;28:612–616. 14.	 Herlitz J, Hansson E, Ringvall E, et al. Predicting a life-threatening disease and death among ambulance-transported patients with chest pain or other symptoms raising suspicion of an acute coronary syndrome. Am J Emerg Med. 2002;20:588–594. 15.	 Rosell-Ortiz F, Mellado-Vergel FJ, Fernandez-Valle P, et al. Initial complications and factors related to prehospital mortality in acute myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation. Emerg Med J. 2015;32:559–563. 16.	 Le May MR, So DY, Dionne R, et al. A citywide protocol for primary PCI in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:231– 240. 17.	 Tanaka A, Matsuo K, Kikuchi M, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy to identify ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction on interpretations of prehospital electrocardiograms. Circ Rep. 2022;4:289–297. 18.	 Keeley E, Boura, JA, Grines, CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet 2003;361:13–20. 19.	 De Luca G, Suryapranata H, Ottervanger JP, Antman EM. Time delay to treatment and mortality in primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: every minute of delay counts. Circulation. 2004;109:1223–1225. 20.	 McNamara RL, Wang Y, Herrin J, et al. Effect of door-to-balloon time on mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:2180–2186. 21.	 De Luca G, Biondi-Zoccai G, Marino P. Transferring patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction for mechanical reperfusion: a meta-regression analysis of randomized trials. Ann Emerg Med. 2008;52:665–676. 22.	 Andersen HR, Nielsen TT, Rasmussen K, et al. A comparison of coronary angioplasty with fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:733–742. 23.	 Widimsky P, Budesinsky T, Vorac D, et al. Long distance transport for primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. Final results of the randomized national multicentre trial PRAGUE-2. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:94–104. 24.	 Fordyce CB, Al-Khalidi HR, Jollis JG, et al. Association of rapid care process implementation on reperfusion times across multiple ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction networks. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:e004061. 25.	 Savage ML, Poon KK, Johnston EM, et al. Pre-hospital ambulance notifica-

tion and initiation of treatment of ST elevation myocardial infarction is associated with significant reduction in door-to-balloon time for primary PCI. Heart Lung Circ. 2014;23:435–443. 3.1.2. Initial In-Hospital Assessment of Patients With Confirmed or Suspected ACS 1.	 Diercks DB, Peacock WF, Hiestand BC, et al. Frequency and consequences of recording an electrocardiogram >10 minutes after arrival in an emergency room in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (from the CRUSADE Initiative). Am J Cardiol. 2006;97:437–442. 2.	 Diercks DB, Kontos MC, Chen AY, et al. Utilization and impact of prehospital electrocardiograms for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: data from the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry) ACTION (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network) Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:161–166. 3.	 Riley RF, Newby LK, Don CW, et al. Diagnostic time course, treatment, and

in-hospital outcomes for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial

Downloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on October 7, 2026