p.63 抽出テキスト

November 30, 2021 Circulation. 2021;144:e368–e454. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001029 e430

CLINICAL STATEMENTS AND GUIDELINES 4.1.2.1 Intermediate-Risk Patients With Acute Chest Pain and No Known CAD

1 Goldstein JA, Chinnaiyan KM, Abidov A, et al. The CT-STAT (Coronary Com-

puted Tomographic Angiography for Systematic Triage of Acute Chest Pain Patients to Treatment) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:1414–1422. 2.	 Litt HI, Gatsonis C, Snyder B, et al. CT angiography for safe discharge of patients with possible acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1393–1403. 3.	 Goodacre S, Thokala P, Carroll C, et al. Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of diagnostic strategies for suspected acute coronary syndrome. Health Technol Assess. 2013;17:v–vi; 1–188. 4.	 Goldstein JA, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, et al. A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:863–871. 5.	 Chang SA, Choi SI, Choi EK, et al. Usefulness of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography as an initial diagnostic approach in patients with acute chest pain. Am Heart J. 2008;156:375–383. 6.	 Miller AH, Pepe PE, Peshock R, et al. Is coronary computed tomography angiography a resource sparing strategy in the risk stratification and evaluation of acute chest pain? Results of a randomized controlled trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18:458–467. 7.	 Hoffmann U, Truong QA, Schoenfeld DA, et al. Coronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest pain. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:299–308. 8.	 Linde JJ, Kofoed KF, Sorgaard M, et al. Cardiac computed tomography guided treatment strategy in patients with recent acute-onset chest pain: results from the randomised, controlled trial: CArdiac cT in the treatment of acute CHest pain (CATCH) Int J Cardiol. 2013;168:5257–5262. 9.	 Hamilton-Craig C, Fifoot A, Hansen M, et al. Diagnostic performance and cost of CT angiography versus stress ECG—a randomized prospective study of suspected acute coronary syndrome chest pain in the emergency department (CT-COMPARE) Int J Cardiol. 2014;177:867–873. 10.	 Levsky JM, Spevack DM, Travin MI, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography versus radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with chest pain admitted to telemetry: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163:174–183. 11.	 Dedic A, Lubbers MM, Schaap J, et al. Coronary CT angiography for suspected ACS in the era of high-sensitivity troponins: randomized multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:16–26. 12.	 Hoffmann U, Ferencik M, Udelson JE, et al. Prognostic value of noninvasive cardiovascular testing in patients with stable chest pain: insights from the PROMISE trial (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) Circulation. 2017;135:2320–2332. 13.	 Min JK, Dunning A, Lin FY, et al. Age- and sex-related differences in allcause mortality risk based on coronary computed tomography angiography findings results from the International Multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An International Multicenter Registry) of 23 854 patients without known coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:849–860. 14.	 Blankstein R, Ahmed W, Bamberg F, et al. Comparison of exercise treadmill testing with cardiac computed tomography angiography among patients presenting to the emergency room with chest pain: the Rule Out Myocardial Infarction Using Computer-Assisted Tomography (ROMICAT) study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:233–242. 15.	 Jeetley P, Burden L, Stoykova B, et al. Clinical and economic impact of stress echocardiography compared with exercise electrocardiography in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome but negative troponin: a prospective randomized controlled study. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:204–211. 16.	 Dadkhah S, Almuwaqqat Z, Sulaiman S, et al. Sensitive troponin I and stress testing in the emergency department for the early management of chest pain using 2-hour protocol. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2017;16:89–92. 17.	 Nucifora G, Badano LP, Sarraf-Zadegan N, et al. Comparison of early dobutamine stress echocardiography and exercise electrocardiographic testing for management of patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100:1068–1073. 18.	 Jasani G, Papas M, Patel AJ, et al. Immediate stress echocardiography for low-risk chest pain patients in the emergency department: a prospective observational cohort study. J Emerg Med. 2018;54:156–164. 19.	 Krishnan S, Venn R, Blumenthal DM, et al. Utilization of stress testing for low-risk patients with chest discomfort in the emergency department. J Nucl Cardiol. 2019;26:1642–1646. 20.	 Hermann LK, Newman DH, Pleasant WA, et al. Yield of routine provocative

cardiac testing among patients in an emergency department-based chest pain unit. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:1128–1133. 21 Diercks DB, Mumma BE, Frank Peacock W, et al. Incremental value of

objective cardiac testing in addition to physician impression and serial contemporary troponin measurements in women. Acad Emerg Med. 2013;2 0:265–270. 22.	 Poldervaart JM, Six AJ, Backus BE, et al. The predictive value of the exercise ECG for major adverse cardiac events in patients who presented with chest pain in the emergency department. Clin Res Cardiol. 2013;102:305– 312. 23.	 Napoli AM, Tran S, Wang J. Low-risk chest pain patients younger than 40 years do not benefit from admission and stress testing. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2013;12:201–203. 24.	 Scott AC, Bilesky J, Lamanna A, et al. Limited utility of exercise stress testing in the evaluation of suspected acute coronary syndrome in patients aged less than 40 years with intermediate risk features. Emerg Med Australas. 2014;26:170–176. 25.	 Aldous S, Richards AM, Cullen L, et al. The incremental value of stress testing in patients with acute chest pain beyond serial cardiac troponin testing. Emerg Med J. 2016;33:319–324. 26.	 Greenslade JH, Parsonage W, Ho A, et al. Utility of routine exercise stress testing among intermediate risk chest pain patients attending an emergency department. Heart Lung Circ. 2015;24:879–884. 27.	 Skoien W. Diagnostic Yield of Routine Stress Testing in low and intermediate risk chest pain patients under 40 years: a systematic review. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2016;15:114–120. 28.	 Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;130:e344–e426. 29.	 Levsky JM, Haramati LB, Spevack DM, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography versus stress echocardiography in acute chest pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2018;11:1288–1297. 30.	 Heitner JF, Klem I, Rasheed D, et al. Stress cardiac MR imaging compared with stress echocardiography in the early evaluation of patients who present to the emergency department with intermediate-risk chest pain. Radiology. 2014;271:56–64. 31.	 Udelson JE, Beshansky JR, Ballin DS, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging for evaluation and triage of patients with suspected acute cardiac ischemia: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:2693–2700. 32.	 Miller CD, Case LD, Little WC, et al. Stress CMR reduces revascularization, hospital readmission, and recurrent cardiac testing in intermediate-risk patients with acute chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2013;6:785–794. 33.	 Miller CD, Hwang W, Case D, et al. Stress CMR imaging observation unit in the emergency department reduces 1-year medical care costs in patients with acute chest pain: a randomized study for comparison with inpatient care. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2011;4:862–870. 34.	 Miller CD, Hwang W, Hoekstra JW, et al. Stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with observation unit care reduces cost for patients with emergent chest pain: a randomized trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;201056:209–219. 35.	 Ingkanisorn WP, Kwong RY, Bohme NS, et al. Prognosis of negative adenosine stress magnetic resonance in patients presenting to an emergency department with chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:1427–1432. 36.	 Siontis GC, Mavridis D, Greenwood JP, et al. Outcomes of non-invasive diagnostic modalities for the detection of coronary artery disease: network metaanalysis of diagnostic randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2018;360:k504. 37.	 Norgaard BL, Leipsic J, Gaur S, et al. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps) J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:1145–1155. 38.	 Sand NPR, Veien KT, Nielsen SS, et al. Prospective comparison of FFR derived from coronary ct angiography with SPECT perfusion imaging in stable coronary artery disease: the ReASSESS study. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2018;11:1640–1650. 39.	 Patel MR, Norgaard BL, Fairbairn TA, et al. 1-Year impact on medical practice and clinical outcomes of FFRCT: the ADVANCE registry. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2020;13:97–105. 40.	 Fairbairn TA, Nieman K, Akasaka T, et al. Real-world clinical utility and impact on clinical decision-making of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: lessons from the ADVANCE Registry. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:3701–3711. 41.	 Nakanishi R, Osawa K, Ceponiene I, et al. The diagnostic performance

of SPECT-MPI to predict functional significant coronary artery disease by fractional flow reserve derived from CCTA (FFRCT): sub-analysis from ACCURACY and VCT001 studies. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;33:2067–2072.

Downloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on October 7, 2026